6 comments

  • staplung2 hours ago
    The failure of the upper stage is a bummer. If it triggers a months-long review, that will almost certainly bump back the schedule for the prototype Blue Moon lander launch.
  • WalterBright1 hour ago
    Once Elon showed how to do it, and how cost-efficient it was, a rocket company that doesn't do it is not viable.
    • testing223211 hour ago
      Spacex first landed an orbital booster just over 10 years ago and have now landed 600 times.<p>The entire rest of the world combined has done it twice.<p>For a long time people would scoff when it was said they had a 10 year lead, and that others would catch up quickly. Proof meets pudding.
      • gamblor9561 hour ago
        FTA: &quot;SpaceX suffered upper stage failures on three test flights of the massive Starship rocket last year. &quot;<p>SpaceX has also had numerous failures with the larger generation of second stages and currently doesn&#x27;t have a lead there. Nobody does.
        • decimalenough35 minutes ago
          Nobody else has anything remotely like Starship. If they pull it off, and it&#x27;s looking like they will, they will extend their dominance for another decade if not more.<p>Yes, Starship development has been slow and occasionally explodey, but they&#x27;ve successfully demonstrated all the fundamentals and it&#x27;s &quot;just&quot; iteration from here. (They haven&#x27;t gone into full orbit, but that&#x27;s by choice, not lack of capability.)
        • boznz1 hour ago
          It&#x27;s a hard problem, and both SpaceX and Blue Origin will probably have failures in the future too, I am encouraged that they both see failure as a way to do better and looking forward to both of them eventually succeeding. It&#x27;s a good time to be a space nerd.
          • WalterBright32 minutes ago
            There&#x27;s a saying in the racing business. If you&#x27;re not walking back to the pit now and then carrying the steering wheel, you&#x27;re not trying hard enough. If you&#x27;re walking back to the pit too often, you&#x27;re incompetent.
            • bombcar25 minutes ago
              If you always fail, you aren’t trying.<p>If you never fail, you aren’t trying.
  • dwd35 minutes ago
    What I was not aware of is how many satellites Amazon already has in LEO for it&#x27;s own Internet service.<p>They&#x27;ve been flying under the radar there it would seen.
    • cmiles815 minutes ago
      I will be good to have competition for space Internet. It’s unclear though if the market will really support two players. Satellite radio and data quickly ended up consolidating down to one.<p>Amazon is trying to become more vertically integrated but they seem at a structural disadvantage here competing against SpaceX.
  • cmiles818 minutes ago
    Space is hard.<p>Losing payloads hurts though, especially for a new platform.
  • eagerpace1 hour ago
    I know insurance for a launch is typical, but seems really tough to do that for this still “rather experimental” launch. I got to imagine it has costs something like 50% on a project like this.
  • cryptoz3 hours ago
    Video of the booster landing: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xcancel.com&#x2F;JeffBezos&#x2F;status&#x2F;2045874068763632017" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;xcancel.com&#x2F;JeffBezos&#x2F;status&#x2F;2045874068763632017</a>
    • Mistletoe24 minutes ago
      Stupid question I know, but are there people on that boat?
      • XorNot22 minutes ago
        It&#x27;s a drone boat, so no.