11 comments

  • minimaxir1 hour ago
    The prevalent discourse&#x2F;attempt-at-a-meme-but-people-are-taking-it-seriously saying &quot;Bluesky is down because of AI vibecoding!&quot; is starting to get annoying and unoriginal.<p>Even when Bluesky confirmed it&#x27;s a DDoS, the line is now &quot;maybe they wouldn&#x27;t have gotten DDoSed if they didn&#x27;t vibecode and their code was better.&quot;
    • cryzinger46 minutes ago
      A week or two ago, when there was a Bluesky outage and a Claude outage at the same time, people were earnestly pointing to that as evidence that Claude was somehow a load-bearing component of Bluesky, or that AI vibecoding had caused the outage... I had to just disengage but I was also very annoyed by it all.
  • OuterVale30 minutes ago
    The interface seemed to function as normal, but specifically the API was targeted, which left a lot of confused users who were seeing the interface peppered with errors. Watching as it unfolded, it seems it affected certain regions to begin with and then slowly spread worldwide.<p>Seems they might have failed to host the status page (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;status.bsky.app" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;status.bsky.app</a>) separately as well, because that went down several times throughout the outage. They also weren&#x27;t very active in updating the status page, and the notice that was there had a typo of &#x27;reginos&#x27; and a description of &#x27;null&#x27;.
  • userbinator1 hour ago
    What are the chances some company offers to &quot;save&quot; them with a security service which coincidentally will also require users to use the latest officially-sanctioned browsers, OSes, and &quot;trusted&quot; hardware to pass the &quot;security check&quot;...
    • sammy22551 hour ago
      If you&#x27;re referring to Cloudflare, the &quot;security check&quot; is not a default setting. For some reason administrators love to use Under attack mode as a band-aid measure to reduce load on the host.
    • LoganDark27 minutes ago
      At least Apple devices are actually secure and can&#x27;t really be omitted from things other than gaming and business. Granted, gaming and business are pretty important.
  • adrithmetiqa36 minutes ago
    Is this just for fun or is there some underlying purpose to those type of attack?<p>Is it possible to have any certainty when answering that question?
  • ChrisArchitect5 minutes ago
    Source: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bsky.social&#x2F;about&#x2F;blog&#x2F;04-16-2026-bluesky-service-interruption" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bsky.social&#x2F;about&#x2F;blog&#x2F;04-16-2026-bluesky-service-in...</a>
  • aaron69513 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • 0xedd33 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • decremental53 minutes ago
    [dead]
  • weird_tentacles1 hour ago
    [dead]
  • bit19931 hour ago
    A decentralized protocol by definition should not be vulnerable to DDos attacks.
    • minimaxir58 minutes ago
      Bluesky isn&#x27;t ATProto.
      • bit199355 minutes ago
        Thank you for the clarification.
    • anon700057 minutes ago
      You’re saying a mastodon instance can’t vet DDosed?
      • snailmailman11 minutes ago
        The people I follow on mastodon come from a wide variety of instances. While mastodon.social is the largest instance, most of the accounts I follow are elsewhere.<p>Granted, all the smaller instances are likely easier to DOS as they are small instances. But mastodon is <i>actually</i> decentralized. If any one instance goes down, everything else keeps working. Unlike Bluesky and ATProto which is more of a theoretical “could be” decentralized.
      • eukara27 minutes ago
        Truth is if mastodon.social gets ddosd the same as Bluesky I can still use the rest of the network fine. Proof is in the pudding. tons of instances that make up the fabric of redundancy. I think most people would be served better if Bluesky acted differently early with their rollout in a sharded manner?
        • Charon777 minutes ago
          True. The only &#x27;distributed&#x27; part of bluesky is in the PR. Otherwise there&#x27;d be more instances.<p>My mastodon account is not even on mastodon.social, because why would I, when I could have a home server closer to home
  • midtake5 minutes ago
    As a result, CSAM distribution dropped by 50% today.