3 comments

  • lifis36 minutes ago
    That&#x27;s cool but by only supporting Claude Code you are contributing to the Anthropic lock-in problem.<p>This needs to support at least Gemini CLI, Codex and OpenCode as well, preferably by being generic as much as possible.
    • halfwhey30 minutes ago
      Codex and Gemini have ACP servers already:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;zed-industries&#x2F;codex-acp" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;zed-industries&#x2F;codex-acp</a> <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;geminicli.com&#x2F;docs&#x2F;cli&#x2F;acp-mode&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;geminicli.com&#x2F;docs&#x2F;cli&#x2F;acp-mode&#x2F;</a><p>In fact Codex, in OpenAI fashion, have their own protocol as well:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.openai.com&#x2F;codex&#x2F;app-server" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;developers.openai.com&#x2F;codex&#x2F;app-server</a><p>Opencode too. These tools are already so programmable and embeddable, it&#x27;s just Claude Code is a sticking point. But maybe it would be useful to provide a unified CLI and Daemon for all of them.
      • lifis15 minutes ago
        They have ACP servers but they might apply different rate limits or policies if they notice ACP use, while a solution like yours would not trigger that unless it becomes popular enough to specifically detect. It also seems this provides more features them just an ACP server.
        • halfwhey10 minutes ago
          That&#x27;s a good point, I&#x27;ll look into tackling this soon
    • obmelvin22 minutes ago
      It isn&#x27;t ones duty to develop for everybody. If someone makes something for their own use case and shares it, that&#x27;s fine.
      • godelski8 minutes ago
        And that&#x27;s the beauty of open source and code. You can share it freely and easily. There&#x27;s no thing that can be made for everyone.<p>Maybe some irony is everyone tells me they &quot;just care that it works&quot;. Yet it can work and you&#x27;ll always have the comments like above because it works for the reason it was made but not for things it wasn&#x27;t made for. But it&#x27;s open, so modify the code and put in what you want ¯\_(ツ)_&#x2F;¯<p>I guess I should clarify its source available, not &quot;Open Source&quot;. There&#x27;s no license on the project so it&#x27;s default theirs. But no harm if you&#x27;re just editing it yourself. @OP should put up some license to let others know how what is allowed and what isn&#x27;t
  • mikeroySoft8 minutes ago
    License? I see none listed in the repo.
  • colobas48 minutes ago
    Any idea of how this interacts with Anthropic&#x27;s ToS for subscription-based use?
    • cortesoft41 minutes ago
      It looks like it shouldn’t be an issue… it is just a wrapper around CLI calls to the official Claude code. It would be indistinguishable from the Anthropic side, and it isn’t even doing anything hacky or impersonating the official client.
      • halfwhey27 minutes ago
        This is my interpretation as well, Anthropic wants to be in full control of the connection between the client and their servers, and that&#x27;s compatible with what I&#x27;m trying to do.
      • j4525 minutes ago
        Nor is it flooding servers with open claw type use.