From my perspective there are some people that have never built real processes in their life that enjoy having some processes now. But agent processes are less reliable slower and less maintenable then a process that is well-defined and architectured and uses llm’s only where no other solution is sufficient. Classification, drafting, summarizing.<p>I’ve had a Whatsapp assistant since 2023, jailbraked as easy assistant. Only thing I kept using is transcription.<p><a href="https://github.com/askrella/whatsapp-chatgpt" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/askrella/whatsapp-chatgpt</a> was released 3 years ago and many have extended it for more capabilities and arguably its more performant than Openclaw as it can run in all your chat windows. But there’s still no use case.<p>It’s really classification and drafting.
Who is this guy and why is he casually admitting to reading all the user conversations???
If you look at my comment history, you'll see what seems to be someone defending OpenClaw (even though I stopped using it).<p>I have some issues with the article, but I agree with some of the conclusions: It's great tinkering with it if you have time to spare, but not worth using weeks of your time trying to get a perfect setup. It's just not that reliable to use up so much of your time.<p>I will say, it's still amongst the best tools to do a <i>variety</i> of tasks. Yes, each one of those could be done with just a coding agent, but I found it's less effort to get OpenClaw to do it than you writing something for each use case.<p>Very honest question: One of the use cases I had with OpenClaw that I'm missing now that I don't use it: I could tell it (via Telegram) to add something to my TODO list at home while I'm in the office. It would call a custom API I had set up that adds items to my TODO list.<p>How can I replicate this without the hassle of setting up OpenClaw? How would you do it?<p>(My TODO list is strictly on a home PC - no syncing with phone - by design).<p>(BTW, the reason I stopped using OpenClaw is boring: My QEMU SW stopped working and I haven't had time to debug).
<i>> I could tell it (via Telegram) to add something to my TODO list at home while I'm in the office. It would call a custom API I had set up that adds items to my TODO list. How can I replicate this without the hassle of setting up OpenClaw?</i><p>The general idea is make a simple deterministic program that runs on your PC at home in a never ending loop. Every minute or so, check Telegram for a new message. If a message is received, then the program runs "claude -p" with a prompt, whatever MCP tools or CLI permissions it needs, and the contents of your Telegram message. Just leave the program running on your home computer while you're out, and you're done.<p>I don't use Telegram, so coding the part to check Telegram would be the hard part. I use email instead, and have the program check every minute for new mail (I leave my email program running and check the local inbox file). I'd already coded up a local MCP server to manage my ToDo list (Toodledo) so Claude just calls the MCP tools to add the task.
For things like TODO, I guess an email will suffice.<p>However, it was really nice being able to use Telegram and get quick validation. I also had a flow set up where I could send a voice memo. It would take the audio file (ogg), run Whisper, and then pass through an LLM for cleanup, and follow the instructions in my message. Really handy to use while I'm walking around.<p>I guess I want to create my own OpenClaw like agent, but not with its crazy broad access: Just limited to the functionality I allow, and with the convenience of using Telegram. I don't care about memory, soul, etc.
> It would call a custom API I had set up that adds items to my TODO list<p>You can use anything to call this API right? I have multiple iPhone shortcut that does this. Heck, I think you can even use Siri to trigger the shortcut and make it a voice command (a bit unsure, it’s been a while since I played with voice)
> You can use anything to call this API right?<p>The API is on my home PC and not exposed to the outside world. Only OpenClaw via Telegram was. So my question is about the infrastructure:<p>How do I communicate with something at home (it could be the API directly) using a messaging app like Telegram? I definitely want an LLM in the mix. I want to casually tell it what my TODO is, and have it:<p>- Craft it into a concise TODO headline<p>- Craft a detailed summary<p>- Call the API with the above two.<p>I'm not asking in the abstract. What specific tools/technologies should I use?
I'm using openclaw as a personal development bot, which is pretty useful. It pings me throughout the day using crons to complete tasks and follows up on them. But aside from that, it is a very unreliable piece of software. I'm constantly having to fix it, or track down correct configurations. It can just decide to randomly edit it's own config, uses incorrect json keys and then the whole thing is dead. Or it blows through it's context and doesn't know to compact. Then it's just stuck. I can't wait till it matures or something more reliable comes along.
Amen.<p>I love the concept but I've never hosted such a terrible piece of software. Every update breaks something new or introduces another "anti-feature" that's enabled by default.<p>The documentation is often lagging behind and the changelog has such a low signal to noise ratio that you need a LLM to figure out what upgrading will break this time. For now I've just given up on updates and I've been patching bugs directly in the JS when they bother me enough.<p>If OpenClaw is the future of software I'm honestly a bit scared for the industry.<p>I'm open to suggestions, I tried Zeroclaw and Nullclaw but they're bad in their own way. I would like something that's easy to run on Kubernetes with WhatsApp integration and most important, stable releases.
It would’ve happened eventually anyway, but OpenClaw is basically what kickstarted the beginning of the end of token subsidies. It’s a almost <i>begging</i> to be used wastefully. And agents would miss and lose nothing without it. It’s devoid of a reason to exist.
I don't follow the thinking here. If you are using it for coding maybe, but the main use case of openclaw is as a personal assistant. I'm using a $10 a month minimax subscription for it, and I've never used more than 10% usage of a 5 hour window.
> 0 legitimate use cases<p>My teams currently using it for:<p>- SDR research and drafting<p>- Proposal generation<p>- Staging ops work<p>- Landing page generation<p>- Building the company processes into an internal CRM<p>- Daily reporting<p>- Time checks<p>- Yesterday I put together proposal from a previous proposal and meeting notes, (40k worth)
> In every case, when you dig deeper, the story is one of two things: either what they built could already be done with standard AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, any decent LLM with a simple integration), or it’s aspirational<p>All your use cases are fairly well handled by conventional LLM's. OpenClaw is a security nightmare, so it's probably worth switching away.
None of those things require openclaw. You could accomplish them with something like Google Drive and Claude Code CLI.
> None of those things require openclaw.<p>OpenClaw was never meant to be a tool that could do things you couldn't do without it.<p>Also, whenever someone points out you could accomplish something without it, he underestimates the effort needed. In the examples I'm thinking of, someone simply asked OpenClaw to do something, had a few back and forths with it, and it was done. I have yet to see someone say "Oh, I can do that without OpenClaw" and go ahead and do it within 10 minutes.<p>Not once.<p>OpenClaw is flawed, but the convenience is an order of magnitude higher than anything else.
None of those require Claude Code CLI either, you could develop their workflows with a script (bash, python) and any quality LLM.
The difference is I would have to do that myself. It has access to gdrive and cc and does it for me when I send it a message in chat. Sometimes when I’m out I even just send it voicys.
What happens if it makes a mistake? How would you know?
I don’t get people’s hate. Let others enjoy it.
somehow I've been able to do that for 40+ years using my brain, eyes, fingers, vi , CLIs and shell scripts. no unsolved problems there.
I did too :D<p>Nothing of what my agents do, we didn’t previously do. But now I can get moderate to good results with a lot less effort. Allowing the business to expand whilst keeping costs controlled.
I was able to buy stuff from home without the Internet as well.
It is an interesting take. I think this is mainly early adoption pains though. This stuff is moving so fast that if you say 'it isn't useful because X isn't good enough' then just wait a month and X will be good enough to find Y as the blocker (or no blockers are left and it truly does become useful). Soon we will see this hooked into the home assistant world well combined with local and remote compute and then we are likely to see real movement.
The hype around OpenClaw is a bit confusing but I think I figured it out. For most coders, Claude Code in the terminal was an important event. Letting it access code and change files directly. For normal users, they didn’t see the power is that.<p>OpenClaw runs Pi in a terminal and exposes the chat thru Telegram or any chatting app. This gave the ah-ha moment to non-coders that coders had had for 6+ months prior.
I do feel like the memory the biggest hurdle I’ve been encountering and I’m curious what solutions people have been doing to make it work.<p>What seems to be somewhat working for me<p>1. Karpathy wiki approach<p>2. some prompting around telling the llm what to store and not.<p>But it still feels brittle. I don’t think it’s just a retrieval problem. In fact I feel like the retrieval is relatively easy.<p>It’s the write part, getting the agent to know what it should be memorizing, and how to store it.
As a side note, one thing that seemed to really help was having the agent recursively summarize all the files into a repo map with the same folder/file structure as the repo.<p>And forcing to always orient itself with that repo map first seemed to really help it from tunnel visioning.
its almost as if its rules should be persisted, versioned and tested in a deterministic way. I also wonder if it might end up useful to try enforcing some kind of constraints to data (memory) itself. like if we could enforce atomicity, consistency, isolation AND durability. and transparency so no place for malware to hide. and deterministic execution, from fully reproducible builds...<p>er, nevermind. prob just crazy castles in the sky wistful dreams :-)
"Who's in charge here?"<p>"The Claw."<p>Some of this stuff is starting to look like technologies that worked, looked promising, but were at best marginally useful, such as magnetohydrodynamic generators, tokamaks, E-beam lithography, and Ovonics.
Good to know that I'm not alone. I now use it for music recommendations (not so great) and keeping track of restaurants I want to try (really good at this but so are a lot of other apps).
I'm still trying to figure out what to use it for other than news aggregation...
The twist? This article and marketing campaign for it are 100% by OpenClaw.
No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.<p>Sure, anything it does can be done better with specialized tooling. If you know that tooling.<p>The memory thing sounds like an implementation limit rather than something fundamentally unsolvable. Just experiment with different ways of organizing state until something works?
Sounds like an armchair expert
Right back at ya ;)<p>The author makes some good conclusions; I’m as AI-pilled as the next hopefully-not-soon-to-be-ex-software-engineer, and I struggled to find use cases for my Claw that couldn’t be served with a cronjob and $harness.<p>If your findings contradict that, we are all ears - genuinely.
Could we stop with the clickbaiting headlines?
You forgot to add, “Here’s why.” /s<p>I know that headlines are all about eyeballs, but this is seriously just exhausting. Headlines are advertisements and advertisements are about getting engagement. Surely having your audience just getting angry at them isn’t a good thing, right?
Why aren't databases the solution to many memory problems? Maybe this is a naive question:<p>For example, for the invitations in the OP: Have Openclaw write incoming rsvps to a database, probably a flat file here, and use the db as persistent memory: OpenClaw can compose outgoing update emails based on the database. Don't even suggest to OpenClaws that it try to remember the rsvps - its job is just writing to and reading from a database, and composing emails based on the latter. ?<p>Does that violate the experiment, by using some tool in addition to OpenClaw?
IMHO, the biggest problem with OpenClaw and other AI agents is that the use-cases are still being discovered. We have deployed several hundred of these to customers and I think this challenge comes from the fact that AI agents are largely perceived as workflow automation tools so when it comes to business process they are seen as a replacement for more established frameworks.<p>They can automate but they are not reliable. I think of them as work and process augmentation tools but this is not how most customers think in my experience.<p>However, here are a several legit use-case that we use internally which I can freely discuss.<p>There is an experimental single-server dev infrastructure we are working on that is slightly flaky. We deployed a lightweight agent in go (single 6MB binary) that connects to our customer-facing API (we have our own agentic platform) where the real agent is sitting and can be reconfigured. The agent monitors the server for various health issues. These could be anything from stalled VMs, unexpected errors etc. It is firecracker VMs that we use in very particular way and we don't know yet the scope of the system. When such situations are detected the agent automatically corrects the problems. It keeps of log what it did in a reusable space (resource type that we have) under a folder called learnings. We use these files to correct the core issues when we have the type to work on the code.<p>We have an AI agent called Studio Bot. It exists in Slack. It wakes up multiple times during the day. It analyses our current marketing efforts and if it finds something useful, it creates the graphics and posts to be sent out to several of our social media channels. A member of staff reviews these suggestions. Most of the time they need to follow up with subsequent request to change things and finally push the changes to buffer. I also use the agent to generate branded cover images for linkedin, x and reddit articles in various aspect ratios. It is a very useful tool that produces graphics with our brand colours and aesthetics but it is not perfect.<p>We have a customer support agent that monitors how well we handle support request in zendesk. It does not automatically engage with customers. What it does is to supervise the backlog of support tickets and chase the team when we fall behind, which happens.<p>We have quite a few more scattered in various places. Some of them are even public.<p>In my mind, the trick is to think of AI agents as augmentation tools. In other words, instead of asking how can I take myself out of the equation, the better question is how can I improve the situation. Sometimes just providing more contextually relevant information is more than enough. Sometimes, you need a simple helper that own a certain part of the business.<p>I hope this helps.
I was getting a lot of use case out of it mainly interacting with the file system.<p>The problem is if not carefully designed it will burn through tokens like crazy.
It can integrate apis for you on the fly. That’s one of the biggest usecases IMO. Combine that with skills, cron, and sub-agents, and you get a lot of power there.
there are zero legitmate use cases? sure bro.
you can say that to my claw which is making me more money than my salary
I'm hard pressed to believe that OpenClaw has zero use cases. Probably author never bothered to look outside his bubble.<p>True story - I was a drunk homeless last week. Some kind soul threw me $10 and I got an affordable Hetzner VPS. Installed OpenClaw and hooked OpenRouter then pointed it to Dow Jones and installed some skills.<p>It built me a SaaS product making 100 million MRR while managing my stocks portfolio and last evening I shifted to my 122 rooms wide palace.