If you liked Love2D, please take a look at Carimbo (my engine).<p><a href="https://github.com/willtobyte/carimbo" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/willtobyte/carimbo</a><p>I have a game on Steam made with it, the game is open-source now.<p><a href="https://github.com/willtobyte/reprobate" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/willtobyte/reprobate</a>
One of the biggest recent indie hits, Balatro, was made in Löve!<p>I really like it, the developer experience is so smooth for beginners, just drag a zip onto the exe and it starts. And the APIs are simple enough to memorize while allowing pretty cool rendering stuff.
Balatro ships with the entire unobfuscated Lua source by the way.<p>I once checked if the odds stated on a card were implemented wrong. Turns out no, the code checks out, I'm just that unlucky.
too bad universe doesn't ship with unobfuscated source so that you could see whether you're unlucky, or just skill issue
I don't have to check the source code to know that for me it's a skill issue :/
The source is right there, you just have to grok it.
Good news: the universe is written in LISP. Bad news: with no comments.
You can ask AI to comment an entire code base now in as much detail as you need.
> the universe is written in LISP<p>Ostensibly. Honestly most of it was hacked together with Perl.<p><a href="https://xkcd.com/224/" rel="nofollow">https://xkcd.com/224/</a>
Well, it's kind of a machine code for a self-modifying compiler, so there's that.
that's great, could read the source code on how to unify gravity and quantum mechanics for all energy levels? vibeing to a nobel price will be cool...
I'm still waiting for the slackers at CERN to finish decompiling it.
hahaha, I did the exact same thing after the game came out to see if wheel of fortune was really a 1/4 chance
lol, love seeing that I'm not the only one who did this. Being suspicious of WoF was the first and last time I peeked at the Balatro source.
Game developers sometimes make the “randomness” favor the player, because of how we perceive randomness and chance.<p>For example in Sid Meier’s Memoir, this is mentioned.<p>Quoting from a review of said book:<p>> People hate randomness: To placate people's busted sense of randomness and overdeveloped sense of fairness, Civ Revolutions had to implement some interesting decisions: any 3:1 battle in favor of human became a guaranteed win. Too many randomly bad outcomes in a row were mitigated.<p><a href="https://smus.com/books/sid-meiers-memoir/" rel="nofollow">https://smus.com/books/sid-meiers-memoir/</a><p>Some threads on randomness and perceived fairness in video games can be found here on HN too, for example <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19399044">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19399044</a><p>The original link being discussed in that thread is 404 now, but archived copies of the original link exist such as for example <a href="https://archive.is/8eVqt" rel="nofollow">https://archive.is/8eVqt</a>
I used to get so many comments about how the computer opponent in a tile-based board game of mine cheats and got all the high numbers while they always got low numbers, and I'd be like "that's mathematically impossible. I divide the number of spaces on the board in half, generate a deck of tiles to go into a 'bag', and then give a copy of those same tiles to the other player.<p>So over the course of the game you'll get the exact same tiles, just in a different random order.<p>Now to be fair, I didn't make that clear to the player that's what was happening, they were just seeing numbers come up, but it was still amazing to see how they perceived themselves as getting lower numbers overall compared to the opponent all the time.<p>Meanwhile on the base game difficulty I was beating the computer opponent pretty much every game because it had such basic A.I. where it was placing its tiles almost totally at random (basically I built an array of all possible moves where it would increase its score, and it would pick one at random from all those possibilities, not the best possibility out of those).<p>My Dad used to play a lot of online poker, and he used to complain when other players got lucky with their hands, be like 'I know the chances are like 5% of them getting that! They shouldn't have gotten that!' and it always reminded me of those people.
I worked on a game where we added a "fairness" factor to randomness. If you were unlucky in one battle, you were lucky in the next, and vice versa. Mathematically you ended up completely fair. (The game designer hated it, though, and it wasn't shipped like that)
Games like Battle for Wesnoth which have it implemented right, you’ll look at a 90-10 scenario with 2 attacks and end up with the 1% scenario. Enough to make a man rage. I have degrees in Mathematics, I am aware of statistics, and all that. And yet when I played that game I would still have an instant “wait what, that’s super unlikely” before I had to mentally control for the fact that so many battles happen in a single map.<p>Was good because it identified a personal mental flaw.
Dispatch too. If your odds are above a certain threshold, the mission is a gimme.
I think XCOM does this as well.
The 8-ball joker is even more BS. I think I’ve only seen it trigger once ever.
Neat example of cognitive bias, the brain perceives the Nope as being much more prevalent than it actually is!
For a small while I've had the idea of a [game engine/fantasy console/Scratch clone?] that comes packed with a bunch of example games. The example games should be good enough that people download it just to play them, but they are also encouraged to peek into their source code. I'd hope for it to be a sneaky gateway into programming.<p>For that, I'll keep this in mind: "Unlucky players may look at the source code of a chance-based effect to check if the odds are actually as stated."
I didn't know I could check but after losing like 20 times in a row I just stopped taking WoF. Never saw the good outcome.
Not on steam does it? I can only see the exe and dlls.
I know which card. We were all there. Are the odds wrong? "Nope!"
In case you're curious, here's a Nix derivation to make Balatro for any other system playable on Linux:<p><a href="https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/tree/master/pkgs/by-name/ba/balatro" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/tree/master/pkgs/by-name/ba...</a><p>I wrote half a blog post when I did the derivation. One day, I should finish it and post it here.
> One of the biggest recent indie hits, Balatro, was made in Löve!<p>Moonring[1] is another one that that is written in Löve (apparently by the co-creator of XBox's Fable series). The base game is even available for free. I had lots of fun playing it.<p>[1] <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/2373630/Moonring/" rel="nofollow">https://store.steampowered.com/app/2373630/Moonring/</a>
A lot of indie devs actually are fine with decompiling/viewing source. Even the STS2 devs have no issue with this. I think it is great and helps the indie dev community. Seeing this has actually made me excited about game dev to the point where I'm beginning to dig in myself.
Haven't used it in almost 10 years but at least back then one sticky point was that unlike unity and the like, opening the exe didn't open an IDE. Just kind of a dummy window. Also building for Mac from Windows was a nightmare since my end user was not technically literate and it didn't just run on their end. But that's likely just a Mac issue
Yeah this is amazing. I'd love to see integration with raylib at some point, if possible that is.<p>Lua's small footprint is it's one big advantage in addition to its pleasent syntax but with tiny cc (which raylib supports when I last checked a few years ago) you can get a compact c runtime as well.<p>I haven't worked on a project with either of these frameworks but a couple of years back I was researching into some frameworks and was surprised to learn that I can use raylib on my phone with termux!
Anyone who is a fan of the TV Show Community MUST try out the recreation of the 8 bit video game episode(Digital Estate Planning) called Journey to the Center of Hawkthorne.<p>[1]: <a href="https://projecthawkthorne.com/" rel="nofollow">https://projecthawkthorne.com/</a><p>It is now available to play straight in the browser(I guess using LÖVE Web Builder?).<p>[1]:<a href="https://schellingb.github.io/LoveWebBuilder/" rel="nofollow">https://schellingb.github.io/LoveWebBuilder/</a><p>This engine has really come a long way and enabled such a memorable game for me.
(OP) shameless plug: <a href="https://github.com/clemisch/pc_wars" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/clemisch/pc_wars</a>
I love LÖVE. For me it sits at the perfect intersection between high and low level abstraction. Unfortunately the latest released version is getting pretty long in the tooth now and a lot of devs use the latest HEAD from the repo since it has better performance and compatibility. One day the mythical 12.0 will get released for real…..
It’s been a recurring issue I’ve seen in open source where there is active development but no releases. I don’t get why you’d put all the work in to fixing bugs and building features but not hit the button to build a release.
Been there before, usually because you always feel like there is "one more thing to get into the release" before you consider it "done enough", and that keeps moving. At one point, you've diverged far enough from the previous release, either by time or scope, that now you feel like the next release really should come with major improvements because of other API breakages already, so now you want to fit in more, so the next release after that can skip more breakages.<p>Rinse and repeat over months, with volunteers, in a game engine no less, and I can easily see many projects being unable to not fall into that trap.<p>Anyways, I think it's less of an issue for people in practicality, most people who use LÖVE today tends to start with the HEAD source version, which also sets them up to easier contribute back upstream, when they inevitably hit something non-optimal, so maybe it works out in favor for everyone in the end anyways.
The main issue is that distros will only package the latest release. I had a situation where LMMS on their website had download links pointing to the “beta” builds, while the one on all the disto repos was several years behind.<p>Right now I have a workflow breaking bug in Inkscape which was fixed last year on main but hasn’t made it to a release yet. So my only option is to compile from source.<p>There being a stigma about a release being “ready” needs to go. Stuff should get only get merged in to main when it’s ready to go live, or behind a feature flag.
You might like MonoGame. Same level of abstraction, but in C#.<p><a href="https://monogame.net" rel="nofollow">https://monogame.net</a>
Since we've stepped from interpreted language (Lua) to compiled-to-VM language (C#), let's go all the way down to compiled, low-level language (C) with Raylib!<p><a href="https://www.raylib.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.raylib.com/</a>
"long in the tooth"<p>How? has Lua changed any?<p>Or all the references are to old versions?
I used LÖVE to build a simple Kodi alternative for my home media center setup. My first attempt was using Electron but rewriting to LÖVE meant much simpler code (turns out manually calculating coordinates is simpler than fighting CSS) and less resource consumption (not a high bar, yes). It works so well I might clean it up and open source it...
It also happens to be one of the better ways to do a GUI in Lua :P
If, like me, you have too much "P5 api" muscle memory to really get into LÖVE (not a criticism of that library, tbc), then L5 might be a nice alternative:<p><a href="https://l5lua.org/l5-for-processingp5/" rel="nofollow">https://l5lua.org/l5-for-processingp5/</a>
I generally very much dislike dynamic languages but for some reason I've always really liked Lua. I'm not exactly sure why to be honest.<p>Maybe because you can fit the whole language spec on a single sheet of paper and adding more advanced features is pretty easy.<p>Love looks really cool. I never got into it personally but I still might
The Lua source code is also a masterclass in C, I recommend it to anyone learning that language. It's big enough to be an involved implementation, but small and focused and well-organized enough to (at least roughly) understand what's going on at the various layers. It's a very solidly-written mass of portable C, with only minor exceptions.
I know it’s bikeshedding and leads to pointless discussions, but in my opinion Lua would be the perfect scripting language if it had 0-based indexing.<p>“It makes more sense this way” is not a good enough reason to break convention.
Sometimes I feel like I'm the only person in the world who does not care about zero-indexed VS one-indexed. It's just the way Lua is, no big deal. Then again, I don't care about significant whitespace either. Maybe I'm just weird.
There is nothing stopping you from doing someArray[0] = "the first item", you know.<p>For me, the table is extremely powerful. I like it that it can be used as a sparse array, a hash, a vector, whatever. Of course one must know, at heart, the difference between pairs() and ipairs() and what it means for your data, though ..
> There is nothing stopping you from doing someArray[0] = "the first item", you know.<p>Yes, there is:<p><pre><code> local l = {[0] = 'a', [1] = 'b', [2] = 'c'}
for i, c in ipairs(l) do
print(i, c)
end
</code></pre>
This will only print the last two pairs. Lua is 1-indexed, end of story. You can store values at index zero, but it's no different than storing values at index -1 or index 'lolrofl'. It does not exist in the array-part of the table as far as Lua is concerned.
I've always assumed that there is some technical reason for Lua being 1 indexed, rather than it being a design choice.<p>Either way, I think it's a nitpick to complain about. I've written a decent amount of Lua and there's only been a handful of times where 1-indexing was even relevant to me.
It's a design choice. Lua was first intended to be a configuration language for engineers to enter data at an oil company. They were used to the 1st thing being number 1, the 2nd thing being number 2, and so forth. It's just a very natural way of counting.<p>You don't change something like that because it eventually got picked up by game programmers (never the intent of Lua, something that just happened after it was used by the Grim Fandango team, then it took off in the gaming world).
Lua will forever hold a special place in my heart. It was the first programming language that I actually managed to learn, instead of just attempting to learn it.<p>It was chosen around 2008 or so to be the scripting language in Multi Theft Auto: San Andreas.<p>We build entire worlds in Lua, there were many gamemodes, but my favorite was Roleplay.<p>Good old carefree times.
exactly, the simplicity is its beauty!<p>A single data structure (tables), no built in OOP (you build it with metatables).<p>Coroutines instead of threads.<p>I was curious and explored it in detail here - <a href="https://vectree.io/c/lua-language-design-metatables-coroutines-the-minimal-core-philosophy" rel="nofollow">https://vectree.io/c/lua-language-design-metatables-coroutin...</a>
It has a very lego-like feeling, with simple, orthogonal design that lets you build the language and constructs you need.
Very elegant.
Because Lua is simple and elegant — like the moon, isn’t it?
Lua is a scripting language done right.<p>It doesn’t pretend to be more than it is. Anyone can learn it a couple of sessions. It has all the stuff you need to write a program.<p>Imagine if we had Lua instead of JS in the browser.<p>In fact the latter was once closer to Lua, but didn’t have the same philosophy of wanting to stay minimal.
my favorite game in love:
mario, with portals<p><a href="https://stabyourself.net/mari0/" rel="nofollow">https://stabyourself.net/mari0/</a>
I looove stabyourself. ortho robot was amazing. you know what, let me install again.. here goes my night.
Agreed, mari0 is awesome.<p>Pity it's not playable in even mildly current versions of love because being backwards compatible takes some slight effort on behalf of framework maintainers.
How have they not been sued by Nintendo yet?
My2c. Fintech tech lead who has only a far memory of hand coding games ages ago. Community makes tech awesome. Love2D discord changed my life. Never met a more awesome and welcoming community in my whole life.
Btw, Love2D is based on SDL2. If you hate Lua but needs the same cross-platform capabilities, you can use an SDL2 binding in other languages or make your own.
SDL3 should get more love in general.<p>The SDL3 GPU API[1] provided a cross-platform GPU API even before WebGPU.<p>In Rust it's a good alternative for winit/wgpu. For that reason I added it to areweguiyet.com[2] last week, where apparently it wasn't even listed before.<p>I am currently using it to develop a space game[3] inspired by the original BBC Elite. Using emscripten to get on the web and QUIC/Webtransport for networking.<p>[1]: <a href="https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/CategoryGPU" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/CategoryGPU</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://areweguiyet.com/#ecosystem" rel="nofollow">https://areweguiyet.com/#ecosystem</a><p>[3]: <a href="https://git.levitati.ng/LevitatingBusinessMan/elite/src/branch/quic-webtransport" rel="nofollow">https://git.levitati.ng/LevitatingBusinessMan/elite/src/bran...</a>
SDL3 is something I've been keeping an eye on, but at least one thing that held me back from diving into it was SDL_Mixer (audio library) was not updated to a release version for SDL3 until I think a month ago? I need to get back to it but lately I've been messing with SDL2 + wasm stuff using emscripten.
SDL3 doesn't support bindless resources and the plans to do so in the future are very loose[1].<p>[1] <a href="https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/11148#issuecomment-2575762027" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/libsdl-org/SDL/issues/11148#issuecomment-...</a>
Now why would you hate lua of all things?
For all the reasons, but the 1-based index alone makes me uncomfortable.
In many aspects, Lua is more verbose and awkward than other similar languages. Compare<p><pre><code> local alive_enemies = {}
for _, enemy in ipairs(enemies) do
if not enemy.dead then
table.insert(alive_enemies, enemy)
end
end
enemies = alive_enemies
</code></pre>
with<p><pre><code> enemies = enemies.filter(enemy => enemy.alive)</code></pre>
It's more minimalistic, that's true. But there's nothing stopping you writing or downloading an array library so you can do this:<p><pre><code> enemies = array.filter(enemies, function(e) return e.alive end)
</code></pre>
Or even setting a metatable so you can do:<p><pre><code> enemies = enemies.filter(function(e) return e.alive end)</code></pre>
well, it is true that the second one is more concise.<p>The only difference is that one of the language is embedded and barely takes any place. it's just a few C files :-D It offers just enough functionality while not making it overly complicated to make basic things.<p>The other one is way way bigger. and even Array.filter didn't exist from the start
Alright, here is Janet, which is designed to be embeddable just like Lua:<p><pre><code> (set enemies (filter |($ :alive) enemies))
</code></pre>
Though JavaScript has QuickJS, which is also lightweight.
Small stdlib, “implement it yourself” philosophy to even things like classes, diverging language versions and fragmentation (a lot of people don’t like any of the post 5.1 changes), bad tooling and editor support, dynamic duck typed language with no type hints
If it were about making a choice of which web framework to use on the server, obviously you wouldn't want to use Lua.<p>But if it is about using it as an embedded language. you want just enough language to get you started and be able to tweak controls. so that the embedded language itself doesn't take up unnecessary space, on its own.<p>It's a design choice to have a language as small as possible while still offering cool tools.
I don't necessarily hate Lua, but I prefer C and Raylib for game dev. Lua is garbage collected, dynamically typed, strays far from standard syntax patterns, and has less existing tooling than C.<p>I see why people might hate Lua. Especially for game dev!
There is a lot more that goes into Love2D than just SDL. It uses many other libraries for sound, image loading, etc as well as using luajit so that the lua runs very fast and has a super easy C FFI.
SDL3
Definitely SDL2.<p>Author is currently building version 12 which will be using SDL3. But it's been in development for quite some time with no clear end date afaik.
Who is "the author" these days? Is it Slime? I wonder what Rude and Bartbes and vrld are up to these days. Are releases still done on holidays? Are all libraries still named after sex themes? I was active for versions 0.4 - 0.6.
It is easy to get Lua (with LuaJIT) working with SDL3, though.<p>That obviously isn't a replacement for the framework but it is perfectly doable if someone just wants to write a game in Lua with minimal overhead.<p>Edit: I mention LuaJIT specifically because it lets you create metaclasses around C objects, which is much easier than messing with the Lua stack from C, and it's easy to make a 2d vector class from an SDL Point or a spritesheet or what have you. There are a few rough edges like dealing with pointers and gc but to me it's the best of both worlds (the speed of C, and some implicit type checking, and the flexibility of Lua.)<p>Obviously you could do it the hard way and the other way around with normal modern Lua but it's such a pain in the ass.
I stand corrected!
As far as I know only the latest (unstable) version uses SDL3.
I love löve I did some projects in it, lua was one of my fist programming language, i think it's a great fit for game dev.<p>Also move or die is running on love2d, which is an awesome game.<p>Also I love that trick that you can just zip your files and binary Comcast them to the love2d binary and it will load it.
Lua is very fast - even without the JIT it makes Python feel like wading through molasses.<p>Lua is so small and simple (but not simplistic) that you can keep it completely in your head. Even if you only get to work on your project once every weekend you won’t have to relearn half of it every time.
Interesting. I started playing with Godot this weekend and got something simple to render with some toolbar windows and a statusbar. I’ve always been fascinated by game and graphics programming.
Am I really the first one to mention pico8 in this thread? Anyway, pico8 is another option that has a bit different spin, but you also implement the games in Lua :)
As long as we're doing mentions, here's a reminder. If you bought the racial equality bundle in itch.io you already own pico8. You can download the latest version right now on itch.io.<p>(It is neither open source nor free)
TIC-80 is a nice free as in freedom alternative to PICO-8, and it allows more inputs, which makes for better Tetris games (gotta have that hold piece).
I'm planning on doing a TIC-80 implementation as one of the first major pieces of software on an OS I plan on working on (I've already designed the OS on paper, I just need to actually do the hard part (actually implementing it))
TIC-80 is great indeed, I had even ore fu with it than with PICO-8 and that's a high bar.<p>But there is one gripe -- when packaging apps into executable, TIC-80 pulls templates from the Internet.<p>On one hand, it's not that big deal, we are online basically all time nowadays. But on the other hand, I would expect that kind of software to be self-contained.<p>I found a quite simple (but definitely not frictionless) workaround though - you can build the templates yourself, edit source code to work with localhost instead of TIC website, and host the templates on local webserver.<p>As I said, it's not a frictionless solution, but I don't know C well enough to make more substantial changes to this behaviour.
TIC-80 is wonderful to play in. Besides being free/open, another advantage over PICO-8 is TIC-80 has native support for Fennel. i.e. you can code within the system editor in Lua OR Fennel (or half a dozen other languages!) You don't have to edit and transpile to Lua on the desktop as you would with PICO-8. This has some value in debugging with error messages and line numbers.<p>It's also just plain cool to rock the TIC-80 editor fullscreen with narrow font, coding natively in Lisp and publishing the result to a webpage you can share.<p>I wish the iOS (app) deployment story was a little smoother for TIC-80.
Is this about Master of Blocks?<p>There are a lot of free-as-in-freedom alternatives to (and clones of) PICO-8, but TIC-80 is indeed the most popular one, by far. And popularity is important for any software ecosystem. I really like that it supports other languages, even if that kinda inhibits its ability to be embedded into small hardware.<p>Apparently the nightly release supports DCPM samples now. Dunno why.
It's just that pico8 has much larger ecosystem. There's a new great game almost every day. It is sort of annoying that it's not FOSS, but on the other hand the team/author has sustainable business.
antirez' LOAD81 never gets enough love in these discussions even though it is simply awesome:<p><a href="https://github.com/antirez/load81" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/antirez/load81</a><p>Anyone looking at Lua/SDL/game engines would learn a lot from antirez' fun little afternoon project ..
For anyone looking to code LÖVE2D games directly on an iOS device, I’ve created an app called love2d-studio: <a href="https://marknoteapp.com/love2d-studio" rel="nofollow">https://marknoteapp.com/love2d-studio</a>
I’m a big fan of Love2D as well. it’s simple, efficient, and really easy to get productive with. After just a short learning period, I was able to ship my first indie game on Steam, a small Chinese‑character puzzle game built entirely with Love2D. <a href="https://store.steampowered.com/app/4218330/WordJoy/" rel="nofollow">https://store.steampowered.com/app/4218330/WordJoy/</a>
I use this framework to build prototype applications and it's always a delight. Something about Lua just feels right. Once I'm satisfied with a demo or prototype, I later on port it to native C/C++ implementation.
The website might have been better, in the submission <a href="https://love2d.org" rel="nofollow">https://love2d.org</a>
Could have compiled it to wasm and have an online demo
Interesting this is at the top of hacker news since this is pretty old, great project though
Was going to post a link to the minimal template for setting up Löve2D with Fennel, that I can really recommend, and found this recent article describing that...<p><a href="https://itch.io/jam/love2d-jam-2026/topic/6082771/how-to-get-started-with-love2d-and-fennel" rel="nofollow">https://itch.io/jam/love2d-jam-2026/topic/6082771/how-to-get...</a><p>... posted in the site of the 2026 Löve2D Game Jam, that sounds like something also worth mentioning:
<a href="https://itch.io/jam/love2d-jam-2026" rel="nofollow">https://itch.io/jam/love2d-jam-2026</a><p>Too late to enter. Jam was last month. But there are 47 games to check out there, plus many from previous years.
Fennel is really cool! And you can write games in it :)
<a href="https://fennel-lang.org/" rel="nofollow">https://fennel-lang.org/</a>
As someone that used to write 2D games with things like phaserjs, sdl and even directx7, I always regret I never tried Löve2d. I think Android and iOS packaging was also supported. Is this still the case? What if one wants to integrate IAP?
Pretty sure there is still app packaging documented somewhere. There is also, at least for Android, an official Löve2D Launcher app that can open any love-file saved to the phone and execute it. I use that all the time.<p>The Launcher is available also for old Android versions, which means that old obsolete Android devices (I have some tablets and phones) can be used for whatever it can be fun to still write some GUI for on some spare touchscreen device.
I love this framework, pun intended. I made a clone of Atari's Missile Command with it many years ago when the Portal / Mario mashup game made with LÖVE was popular. <a href="https://github.com/chadpaulson/missile-command" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/chadpaulson/missile-command</a>
LÖVE seems amazing, I’ve always looked at it with curiosity. There’s also the legendary Harvard CS50’s Introduction to 2D Game Development, which now uses it in its latest version.<p>But I’m wondering: why do mature tools like this sometimes end up on Hacker News’ front page without any particular news (like new releases or updates)? It’s just a curiosity, not a critique.
Still think Gideros SDK had more potential
I've used this for many projects that are still working to this day.<p>That said, i'm not impressed. A web-based solution is usually better performing, despite all the bloatware necessary. This says a lot about the state of software development unfortunately.
I'm curious as to how you came to that conclusion. Did you run any tests, or is it just a general observation? What's your computer hardware like? This isn't an accusation of anything, I promise I'm genuinely curious.
I've not done proper scientific comparisons, but had to reimplement some games as websites to make them reliably perform on Raspberry Pi's we used embedded.<p>This is a bit of an apples to oranges scenario, because the algorithm and architecture is not exactly the same, despite the game functioning identical.<p>The main weak points of LÖVE that we hit were mainly around embedded video playback though, which is probably very well optimized in chromium.
I don’t usually push LÖVE to its limits because I tend to make simple games as a hobby but I do keep an eye on its framerate and often it‘s in the 100s of frames per second. So it may not be impressive (in sense of winning benchmarks) but it’s rarely perceivably slow.
It isn't web based? It's a set of Lua scripts that run locally
[dead]
Is Love2D a decent option for gamedev compared to Godot? I finished a really simple game using Unity3D and it was fun, but it sucks to use a closed source engine.
Godot will be familiar to you if you then.<p>Löve on the other hand is 100% just code. You'll not have the gui things and the pletora of different components that go with them. Still gives you freedom. Just too much freedom and not as much helpful preset tools.
Yeah, Love2d is a great option for gamedev. It doesn't have the same built-in tools as Godot so you'll need something else for putting together maps (use Tiled [1]), and you'll need to write your own main/render loops (these are just two for loops, nothing fancy).<p>[1] <a href="https://www.mapeditor.org/" rel="nofollow">https://www.mapeditor.org/</a>
It’s very different, and it depends what you are targeting. I love love2d.<p>I think love2d is better if what you love is coding, everything is code, love2d just executes Lua.<p>If what someone wants to do is make (for example) a 2d platformer, or definately for 3d, and the coding is something you need to do to make your game, goody is better, it includes so many batteries, have a built in gui level editor, etc.<p>One big advantage of love2d (although ironically not loved by many in its audience) is it is the AI friendly engine, as AIs love text and hate GUIs.
bluerevolver amazing shmup made with löve.<p>löve is getting a vulkan backend. I would have prefered löve to be plain and simple C coded instead of this abomination which is c++ (but it seems coding AIs may be very good at assisting mass c++ to plain and simple C port).
I need something like this but for cross platform utilities
UXN can be interesting for 2D games too.
I love their stuff, but curious if anyone besides them actually use uxn to make stuff
The fantasy computer by 100 rabbits? I love their philosophy, I'm glad Varvara exists, but I'm personally not up to program assembly for a 4-color screen, and I'm sure many others are the same.
How is it supposed to be pronounced? Is it just gratuitous diacritics? Or should I pronounce it in my native Swedish (where the names makes me think of leaves rather than love)?<p>(Throwing diacritics on English words look extremely silly to me, since I know how åäö are supposed to be pronounced. It makes something like Motorhead just sound laughable rather than metal.)
The project was started by Norwegians. So I feel like you should apply juuuust the right amount of cheesiness and sort of push that Ø-vowel looong. Not sure if Ruud would agree, though.
I am fairly certain it's a case of <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_umlaut" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_umlaut</a>
I instinctively pronounce it [løv].
Interesting framework :)
I haven't tried Löve, but I somehow enjoyed reading through the README.md, no AI slop, just a natural writing style with tiny indictors showing the authors' enthusiasm in creating software.
The project predates Github, although the first official release came out about a month prior. So, yeah, not a lot of AI slop 20 years ago.