2 comments

  • levocardia1 hour ago
    Butterick&#x27;s is a wonderful resource despite the site itself being a little bit of a UI&#x2F;UX pain (the invisible left&#x2F;right page turn zones always get me), and as long as you ignore a few of his strange quirks (like the mentioned penchant for SMALLCAPS LINKS).<p>Applying his basic rules on line length, font choice, point size, and line spacing can massively improve any document. And it&#x27;s one of the only serious resources for people whose &quot;real job&quot; isn&#x27;t typesetting: most stuff online is for design pros who use InDesign or similar, not Microsoft Word (or html&#x2F;css) like the rest of us.<p>Butterick&#x27;s advice on tables is great: delete ALL the borders, then slowly add back only the ones you need.<p>Disagree on one point re: TFA - Butterick&#x27;s version of the scientific paper is much improved, largely because of the narrower margins. It just looks bad on the page because the image is small. Print both on 8.5x11&quot; paper and the Butterick version would be much better.
  • neilv1 hour ago
    Incidentally, Matthew Butterick gave the Racket documentation a nice makeover.<p>Before: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;planet.racket-lang.org&#x2F;package-source&#x2F;neil&#x2F;roomba.plt&#x2F;1&#x2F;4&#x2F;planet-docs&#x2F;doc&#x2F;index.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;planet.racket-lang.org&#x2F;package-source&#x2F;neil&#x2F;roomba.pl...</a><p>After: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.racket-lang.org&#x2F;roomba&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;docs.racket-lang.org&#x2F;roomba&#x2F;</a>