But is this something new? Wasn't using AI for scamming around for a long time?<p>Scammers started using LLMs to write fishing emails, then scammers started generating images, then they started using AI to vibe code it. Its just a natural progression.<p>From <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47435156">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47435156</a>, we can know that India has a ~70% positive view on AI. While scammers likely didn't fill out the survey, it shows the general view on AI from where most scammers work from and live.
Leaders in the email security space have been seeing this for a while now [0], this is not new. The problem is the means to protect consumer mailboxes outside of Gmail, isn't cost effective since most people do not actually pay for their consumer mailbox and the impacts of compromised accounts do not actually impact the providers. It is going to be interesting to see how this plays out in the consumer space as the complexity of the problem continues to grow while the technology used to stop it stays in the early-2010s.<p>[0] <a href="https://siliconangle.com/2023/12/19/new-report-warns-rise-ai-generated-email-fraud-phishing-attacks/" rel="nofollow">https://siliconangle.com/2023/12/19/new-report-warns-rise-ai...</a>
They don't even need to actually vibecode the emails. Some scam reached my gmail inbox for the french railway company advantage card at a "too low to believe" price. They just downloaded an original email, replaced content urls to their own host and all links to their scam page. Yes, all links even the socials lol. There's one link that was removed instead of replaced (but the text was still there): the unsubscribe notice. I didn't check the page but the email was well done since it just was an edited official one and if the page was equally made I'm sure at least some people got scammed there.
For years I’ve read people claim that the reason spam emails were low quality was to filter for idiots. If the spammers are now reaching for coding agents to clean up the presentation, it seems that theory was bunk.
That theory was always bunk. People just can't comprehend, that the average spammer <i>really</i> is that bad. So that theory was created to make sense of that.<p>Because of my work I investigated a lot of spam, and I discovered real life identities of senders in many cases (because of horrible or no exostent opsec). Most of them were either underage, lived in third world countries, or both.
Scams got sophisticated a while ago where they would exactly replicate things like password reset emails and such including a whole fake replica website that looks identical to the real one.<p>I saw someone fall for one recently where a scammer had created a fake announcement from an email sending company stating they were adding political messages to the bottom of your sent emails, and to log in to opt out. The look and feel of the email was pretty much perfect.
It is better to use the term <i>phishing</i> for spam that is attempting to comprimise your security, over just trying to sell something.<p>LLMs are interesting for phishing as they allow personalisation. Spam is no longer, well exactly the Monty Python meaning.
I thought the “sponsored by nobody” thing to donate through was another example of the spam at first.
The (now possibly vibe-coded) email clients hiding link destinations and the real senders' addresses as well as making it very hard to see the actual message content including all headers don't help either. Scammers might get the visible body content very convincing, but one look at the Received: and From: headers is still a reliable way to discern.
Blacklisting Phone numbers and IP are gonna become extreme now, to the point it wont allow any unknown number/email without `karma` to reach anyone.
I don't understand why something like this exists natively on phones.<p>If someone calls from an unknown number, they get some sort of captcha to prove that they are a human, or they matter is important.<p>For example, the message should say that, if you are geniune, then please call again after 1 minute..
ios added "Call screening" which asks unknown callers to explain who they are and what they want before it rings the receiver.<p>The tricky part for scammers is there is no good answer here, if you claim to be a plumber and the victim hasn't booked a plumber, they won't answer.
That already exists, it's "voicemail". The scammers never leave a voice mail (idk why). If a real person is trying to reach you, they'll either leave a voice mail or text you after you don't pick up.
definitely a big issue especially with all the big places now vibe coding and leaking all our damned data in plaintext. a lot of people are getting hit real hard now. its not a joke or overstatement.
This is interesting but I am not surprised. People got used to spammers putting in zero effort because it's a game of scale for them. Well now zero effort still gets them all the way there when it comes to looking convincing.
This is hardly new, and it goes far beyond spam emails. Most of the content produced and consumed on the internet is now done by machines. A human may or may not benefit from directing a machine to do this, and the ways they do are often highly opaque, with several layers of indirection. It doesn't take a genius to see that this is ushering in a new era of scams and spam.<p>"AI" companies are responsible for this mess. They should be held accountable for digging us out of it.
That LLMs are enabling more use cases to hurt us than help us is too obvious to deny. But too many people think they're going to be the ones getting rich from it so they pretend it's not the case.
Full circle.
... does't matter if they got flagged as spam.
[dead]
[dead]
At this point, if you give out your email and not aliases; it is on YOU.