3 comments

  • __mharrison__12 minutes ago
    Good pandas and polars code should also be written in an immutable way...
    • nxpnsv6 minutes ago
      Agree. While it is common to see code like these pandas examples, it is very possible to write these manipulations so that they return a new frame or view without changing the inputs.
    • epgui7 minutes ago
      Good python code can exist, but python makes it so easy to write bad code that good python rarely exists.
  • ertucetin29 minutes ago
    I’ve built many different kinds of software (backend, frontend, 3D games, cli tools, code editor, and more) with Clojure and have been using it for over a decade now.<p>I can confidently say that, among the list I mentioned, it’s the best for data manipulation&#x2F;transformation. Thanks to the author for presenting it clearly and showing how the libraries and code look across different languages, all of which do a great job.<p>But Clojure has its own special place (maybe in my heart as well :). I think Clojure should be used more in the data science space. Thanks to the JVM, it can be very performant (I’m looking at you, Python).
  • soumyaskartha32 minutes ago
    Clojure never got the data science crowd even though the language is genuinely good for it. Always felt like a distribution problem more than a technical one.
    • asa40019 minutes ago
      Unfortunately, having to mess around with a JVM is a tough sell for a lot of data analysis folks. I&#x27;m not saying it&#x27;s rational or right, but a lot of people hear &quot;JVM&quot; and they go &quot;no thank you&quot;. Personally I think it&#x27;s a non-issue, but you have to meet people where they are.