18 comments

  • pjmlp41 minutes ago
    Is this really a thing?!? Blasting the others with unwanted noise.<p>I never been in a flight, or train across Europe where passengers showed just lack of respect for the others.<p>The only ones pumping anything loud, on trains or busses, usually get quickly pointed down by other passengers, personal or security.<p>Ah, and then there are the rebellious kids or gangs, as the other exception, which usually don&#x27;t take flights anyway.
    • balderdash1 minute ago
      It is - there are three groups of people that do this generally the completely self absorbed, people from places where it’s culturally acceptable, and people that like the feeling of empowerment that comes from a inconveniencing others (the same people that will walk out into traffic with no light &#x2F; crosswalk)
    • NikolaNovak17 minutes ago
      I am astonished how many people now use speakerphone as their default interaction. On subway, go train, in grocery stores, on the streets, sometimes even in the office, they blast their conversations with zero care.<p>And so yes, I&#x27;ve definitely seen and experienced people watching inane tiktoks on speaker in subway or bus or airplane. It&#x27;s the epitome of complete lack of empathy or self awareness to me, but I guess that&#x27;s the way culture is going.
      • lostlogin14 minutes ago
        Phone makers deleted the speaker is the ‘courage’ I want.
    • mikkupikku39 minutes ago
      In America, a small number of people derive pleasure from being disruptive to everybody, and blasting music on public transit with captive audiences is a very &quot;traditional&quot; way of fucking with people and expressing your broad contempt for their society. I&#x27;d estimate that maybe one in five times you get on a city bus in America, you&#x27;ll encounter somebody like this.<p>Very rarely does anybody call them out or otherwise try to reign it in, because you&#x27;re as likely as not to be physically attacked and in America, the odds of bystanders coming to your rescue are... Not zero, but not great.
      • andy9921 minutes ago
        Pretty sure on planes this is more ignorance than malice. It’s self absorbed people that are too selfish to consider someone else might not want to hear what they’re watching, rather than some deliberate anti society thing.<p>Regardless, no punishment is too harsh, this should be considered the equivalent of lighting up a cigarette on a plane.
        • sowbug7 minutes ago
          Another angle is kids who have been given a tablet as a pacifier. Their parents are often on autopilot, having checked out months or years earlier.<p>On topic (and discussed already on HN): <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Pankajtanwarbanna&#x2F;stfu" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Pankajtanwarbanna&#x2F;stfu</a>
        • e4018 minutes ago
          The idea someone doesn’t know they bothering everyone around them is absurd. It is 100% malice.
          • andy9910 minutes ago
            I don’t know if anyone remembers the movie Inside Man where at the beginning they are waiting in line at the bank and the woman is having a loud conversation on her phone and the guard comes and tells here to keep it down. It’s this kind of person that I see not using speakers (when the movie was made I don’t think they contemplated humanity could sink that low), at best it’s entitlement, but I still think in most cases it boils down to not thinking about others vs actively trying to annoy them.
          • y1n010 minutes ago
            I’m sure it is, much of the time. But I also believe many people are just completely self absorbed and devoid of empathy.
          • dymk3 minutes ago
            It&#x27;s apathy
      • hallole24 minutes ago
        I don&#x27;t think I&#x27;d have the wherewithal to jump in and do something if I were a bystander. I&#x27;m not the sort to throw hands, I don&#x27;t carry, and these disruptive types are already a bit feral.<p>I&#x27;m not sure it&#x27;s contempt they&#x27;re expressing, or if they&#x27;re expressing anything at all. There really are people who enjoy and defend it, too; &quot;it&#x27;s just a guy playing music, mind your own business.&quot; Truly alien.
        • AnimalMuppet21 minutes ago
          <i>My business</i> includes <i>my ears</i>. If you don&#x27;t want me in <i>your</i> business, keep your business to <i>your</i> ears.
        • standardUser6 minutes ago
          I&#x27;ve found that looking the person in the eye and giving a quick &quot;hey, forget your headphones?&quot; sometimes does the trick, and has yet to start a fight. Everyone has to act in ways they are comfortable with - but mass inaction is what creates space for this shitty behavior in the first place.
          • dymk2 minutes ago
            I did this on a bus and had a gun pulled on me, so your mileage may vary
      • wanderingstan9 minutes ago
        My go-to technique has been to offer the offender a pair of headphones, saying something to insinuate that they must forgotten theirs or be too poor to afford them. Most of the time they say “oh I have headphones!” and then realize that they’ve outed themselves. (I stockpile the free headphones from gyms or airplanes, or get the $2 ones from AliExpress)
      • CalRobert25 minutes ago
        Happens elsewhere too. Can be an issue in Dutch trains
      • LaurensBER35 minutes ago
        20%? That&#x27;s a bit insane. This does happen in Europe but is heavily looked down up on and usually quickly corrected.<p>On the other hand I did get a chewing out from an older guy for having a conversation with friends on a train once, so some people take it perhaps a bit too serious.
        • keiferski33 minutes ago
          It’s very much a thing on US public transit, with the added negative bonus that no one ever confronts the person doing it, because chances are they’re either crazy, armed, or both.
      • striking16 minutes ago
        Sure, but also you might be on a city bus for... half an hour? It&#x27;s not pleasant to have someone blast noise but it&#x27;s nothing like a multi-hour flight. Why bother?
      • kQq9oHeAz6wLLS3 minutes ago
        &gt; and in America, the odds of bystanders coming to your rescue are... Not zero, but not great<p>Yes, because there&#x27;s been a recent push to more heavily punish good Samaritans than perpetrators. When good men get metaphorically crucified for helping, they stop helping.<p>If that seems like a common sense outcome of such policies, you&#x27;re right. But as we&#x27;ve seen time and again, common sense is not a flower that grows in everyone&#x27;s garden.
      • johnfn7 minutes ago
        I mean, you are painting it as some moralistic judgement, but if you’re asking me for on one hand listening to some annoying music, and on the other hand having some chance (however slight) of bodily injury, knife wound, or whatever… I know which one I am going to choose.
      • JumpCrisscross37 minutes ago
        I’ve absolutely seen this nonsense in the UK.
        • mikkupikku33 minutes ago
          Doesn&#x27;t surprise me, but I&#x27;m only speaking from my experience in America.
        • gib44427 minutes ago
          Yup. Eg guys getting on Thameslink services in south London, walking right up to the area behind the driver&#x27;s cab and and start creating a disturbance. Driver stops the train and has a go at them if he&#x27;s feeling in the mood...
      • slg31 minutes ago
        &gt;is a very &quot;traditional&quot; way of fucking with people and expressing your broad contempt for their society.<p>Motivated in large part as a response to society saying fuck them. I&#x27;m not defending assholes being assholes, but I think what we have been seeing in the US over the last 5 or 10 years is classic collapse of the social contract stuff. The less a society cares about its people the less its people will care about the rest of society.
        • mikkupikku26 minutes ago
          I get what you&#x27;re saying, but blasting music on buses has been a thing since boom-boxes were invented, it&#x27;s nothing new. I am also not inclined to blame systems instead of individuals because most people with the same background of injustice will choose to respond to that injustice by being better than it. It&#x27;s only a very small number of people being disruptive like this, while the number of people with fair and understandable grievances against society is massive.
          • 3eb7988a166313 minutes ago
            It was referenced in the 1986 Star Trek movie -Spock incapacitates a guy after he refuses to turn down his stereo.
          • slg16 minutes ago
            &gt;I get what you&#x27;re saying, but blasting music on buses has been a thing since boom-boxes were invented, it&#x27;s nothing new.<p>Yes, because people have always felt like outsiders in relation to society. My point was that this sort of public misbehaving is getting worse because social cohesion is getting even worse. Not everyone with grievances against society will respond this way, but as more people have grievances against society, more people will respond in a manner like this.
    • verall21 minutes ago
      From what I can tell, if no rule is enforced, about 2-5% of people think it&#x27;s totally normal to scroll tiktok or instagram at full volume in public.<p>So on a crowded bus you&#x27;ve normally got 1 or 2. Behavior is actually much better on airplanes, usually (maybe 1-2 in ~150 passenger plane), and I have never seen someone who did not silence their phone after being asked politely by the attendant.
    • Findecanor28 minutes ago
      I&#x27;ve experienced it all over Europe. Trains with reserved seats tend to have a separate &quot;silent car&quot; for this reason.
    • halapro16 minutes ago
      It&#x27;s a thing everywhere except very well-behaved places&#x2F;countries. This means it&#x27;s almost everywhere.<p>The last time I had an uncle blast his Doujin feed at full volume next to me, I suggested he lower the volume, he didn&#x27;t care, so I blasted my own feed at louder volume. He got it then. Sadly people a few rows back did the same on the next train...
    • Hamuko5 minutes ago
      Local trains are full of them.
    • gspr37 minutes ago
      I&#x27;ve definitely experienced this on public transit in cities in several different countries here in Europe. It&#x27;s not an everyday experience, but it definitely happens.
      • pjmlp33 minutes ago
        Yes, but that isn&#x27;t a flight.
    • throaway754636 minutes ago
      [flagged]
    • nslsm31 minutes ago
      That&#x27;s because in Europe certain demographics don&#x27;t catch many planes or trains. But they do catch the tube or the bus, so get on one of those and enjoy the experience.
  • osti56 minutes ago
    During flights? Sounds a bit harsh.
    • RobotToaster0 minutes ago
      Not harsh enough. They belong in the special level of hell reserved for child molesters and people who talk in the theatre.
    • cobbzilla51 minutes ago
      Have you ever tried to sleep while the person next to you watches a movie at full volume?
      • furyofantares42 minutes ago
        Yeah, it sucks. I agree with you, they should be brutally murdered.
        • nxpnsv35 minutes ago
          That&#x27;s too harsh, a regular murder would suffice.
          • sharkweek25 minutes ago
            Just put them in row 24 on a Boeing 737 max and let the problem take care of itself.
          • halapro16 minutes ago
            Just open the window
            • lostlogin13 minutes ago
              Boeing tried this new feature.
              • halapro11 minutes ago
                Not a bug, works as intended.
          • lelanthran24 minutes ago
            &gt; That&#x27;s too harsh, a regular murder would suffice.<p>Correct. Kicking someone off during a flight and not giving them a parachute counts as a regular murder...
            • verdverm9 minutes ago
              Requisite link to satirical study<p>&quot;Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma when jumping from aircraft: randomized controlled trial&quot;<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bmj.com&#x2F;content&#x2F;363&#x2F;bmj.k5094" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bmj.com&#x2F;content&#x2F;363&#x2F;bmj.k5094</a>
    • Hamuko4 minutes ago
      Harsh, but fair.
    • throwaway89434545 minutes ago
      Seems like this flew right over a few heads.
      • widowlark40 minutes ago
        and yet the joke fell right into our laps
        • sebastiennight38 minutes ago
          United says we should tone down the sarcasm
    • quietsegfault54 minutes ago
      NO TICKET
      • lelanthran11 minutes ago
        I wonder how many people got this reference.<p>Anyway, for those who did not: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=rCZ86O3PO-U" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.youtube.com&#x2F;watch?v=rCZ86O3PO-U</a>
    • chisel19251 minutes ago
      &gt; During flights? Sounds a bit harsh.<p>Sounds harsh to you.<p>Let the market decide.<p>Vote with your wallet and fly a different airline.
      • saint1146 minutes ago
        But kicking someone off mid-flight at high altitude is still a bit harsh. I hope they give them parachutes at least.
        • HPsquared35 minutes ago
          Only if they paid extra at check-in.
          • doubled11231 minutes ago
            And you specifically have to request it. It isn’t a normal option during purchase.
        • gumby27145 minutes ago
          Bet it won&#x27;t happen twice though.
        • MPSimmons22 minutes ago
          &gt; give them parachutes at least<p>the first time
      • andrewflnr28 minutes ago
        I&#x27;m going to vote with my wallet by moving United up my priority list.
      • integralid45 minutes ago
        Either you missed the joke or I missed your sarcasm. I read GP as a joke: being literally kicked out of a flight in air is a death sentence, which is a bit harsh penalty indeed.
  • gnabgib50 minutes ago
    Discussion (18 points, 15 days ago, 15 comments) <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47276399">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=47276399</a>
    • binarymax7 minutes ago
      I want to echo the top comment in that post. Apple removing the headphone jack from iPhones was absolutely criminal.
  • raggi43 minutes ago
    Ok, but how about kicking sick people off of flights, particularly trans continental?
    • INTPenis12 minutes ago
      I&#x27;m behind this 100%.<p>I got a SARS virus flying to Udon Thani in 2019. We were seated next to two thai guys who were so sick they could barely sit up straight. We offered them help and treats because they looked like they were about to vomit.<p>Plane lands, next day I&#x27;m sick. I was laid up for 2 weeks with fever, the shits, and I had a weird spontaneous cough for over 1 month after I got better.<p>I bet most of that plane got sick, and it was so damn avoidable.
    • JumpCrisscross42 minutes ago
      &gt; <i>how about kicking sick people off of flights</i><p>Difficult for the airline to do given the myriad of health privacy adjacents.
      • sebastiennight37 minutes ago
        What if we asked the President to give us a quick rundown of each passenger&#x27;s health?
  • mikkupikku47 minutes ago
    At cruising altitude, I hope.
  • HPsquared37 minutes ago
    I assume it&#x27;s about blasting others with noise, not company sponsored headphones.
    • mindslight15 minutes ago
      Disinforming clickbait headline strikes again. This isn&#x27;t about it being mandatory to use headphones, ala TNG &quot;The Game&quot;. Rather it&#x27;s about using speakers that broadcast sound for everyone to hear. I haven&#x27;t been molested and crushed^w^w^w^wflown in quite some time, but with the noise floor on airplanes being so high to begin with, I&#x27;d imagine the result is much worse than somewhere that is at least quieter to start.
  • verdverm11 minutes ago
    An app you can use to play back their audio on a short delay that messes with the brain<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Pankajtanwarbanna&#x2F;stfu" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;Pankajtanwarbanna&#x2F;stfu</a>
  • temporallobe52 minutes ago
    Good.
  • standardUser9 minutes ago
    They should be stripped of all citizenship and left to live out their life roaming the airport. But this is a start.
  • keiferski53 minutes ago
    I first interpreted the title as meaning you must use the cheapo free headphones and aren’t allowed to use your own.
  • SilverElfin59 minutes ago
    We need to also ban people taking calls on speaker in public places like cafes or trains.
    • lagniappe56 minutes ago
      Join the conversation, works every time.
    • lokar48 minutes ago
      You should be able to report them to apple and google, lifetime smart phone ban.
    • irishcoffee55 minutes ago
      I don’t think United airlines has the authority to do that.<p>That is to say, do you really want a federal law passed about this? I vote we go with social shaming. Worked for cigarettes.
      • balderdash5 minutes ago
        Of course they do - they modified their contract of carriage - which you basically agree to why buy a flight (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.united.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;us&#x2F;fly&#x2F;contract-of-carriage.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.united.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;us&#x2F;fly&#x2F;contract-of-carriage.html</a>) it’s the same mechanism they use to deny you boarding if you are barefoot etc.
      • mikkupikku46 minutes ago
        It didn&#x27;t really work well with cigs until govs started banning smoking in restaurants, bars, etc. That said, the shaming was important for setting the social stage for such legal bans.
      • bigstrat200336 minutes ago
        I don&#x27;t really want that. But I do sometimes fantasize about revoking some people&#x27;s ability to use speakerphone or reply-all.
      • SilverElfin51 minutes ago
        Shaming doesn’t always work. I’ve asked politely and been threatened in return by people that look dangerous. That made me want to avoid confrontation in the future.
  • paxys24 minutes ago
    Good, now do the same for public transit.
  • dmitrygr54 minutes ago
    Yes! Now do the same on beaches, busses, streets. Same punishment: banishment from the area.
    • JumpCrisscross41 minutes ago
      &gt; <i>beaches, busses, streets</i><p>Bus, sure. On beaches and streets you have the option of moving away. It’s obnoxious. But in the same category as a large group walking slowly.
    • SilverElfin50 minutes ago
      I often see younger people in parks near me blasting loud music on speakers. It’s so disrespectful to those looking for a peaceful place. Especially when they’re playing explicit rap music with everyone’s families and children around.
      • wolvoleo44 minutes ago
        Yeah or people on bikes with a boombox. They do it because it&#x27;s illegal to cycle with earphones in in these parts. But it creates its own problem of course.
        • mikkupikku41 minutes ago
          I wonder if shoulder mounted speakers that aren&#x27;t touching the users ears could help resolve this to everybody&#x27;s reasonable satisfaction. (That is, everybody who&#x27;s not deliberately trying to broadcast their music to everybody else.)
      • JumpCrisscross40 minutes ago
        &gt; <i>It’s so disrespectful to those looking for a peaceful place</i><p>Idk, they’re not looking for “a peaceful place” and are using a public space without damaging it. Nobody is forced to use the park at the same time as them. This seems like a difference in preferences which is fine.
        • which1 minute ago
          That same line of reasoning could apply to music on planes. No one really needs to use a particular airline at a particular time or use a public park at any given time. It&#x27;s ceases to be a public place if a small group of people can de facto monopolize it by making it unpleasant for most other people to be there.<p>James Q. Wilson talked about this problem a long time... and there&#x27;s no good solution to it. Maybe there is an increasingly different set of norms among different generations which is why you have a breakdown in manners and even high school kids from affluent areas hitting &quot;devious licks.&quot;<p><pre><code> Because the sanctions employed are subtle, informal, and delicate, not everyone is equally vulnerable to everyone else’s discipline. Furthermore, if there is not a generally shared agreement as to appropriate standards of conduct, these sanctions will be inadequate to correct such deviations as occur. A slight departure from a norm is set right by a casual remark; a commitment to a different norm is very hard to alter, unless, of course, the deviant party is “eager to fit in,” in which case he is not committed to the different norm at all but simply looking for signs as to what the preferred norms may be.</code></pre>
        • kstrauser16 minutes ago
          One person playing loud music makes the park less enjoyable for thirty people around them. That’s not “preferences”, when their method of consuming the public space affects the way everyone around them experiences it.
        • leptons12 minutes ago
          There are typically noise rules at most parks where I live. The people who &quot;blast loud music&quot; are breaking the rules, and annoying everyone else at the park. That&#x27;s not cool, and they should get kicked out if they don&#x27;t comply.
      • izzydata41 minutes ago
        I was recently in Hawaii in the middle of the forest and this group nearby on the trail were blasting music from a bluetooth speaker. Whether it is compelte lack of self awareness or utter disregard for other people it is just disturbing behavior.
  • nexxuz44 minutes ago
    [flagged]
  • ashwinnair9936 minutes ago
    Airlines have been quietly expanding what they can remove you for. This isn&#x27;t really about headphones. It&#x27;s about how much discretion crew have now and how little recourse you have at 35,000 feet.
    • lelanthran14 minutes ago
      Look... if me and 199 other passengers are going to abide by restrictions we were informed about before we paid any money for a ticket, it&#x27;s completely unfair that the authorities make an exception for <i>one</i> passenger who accepted the same contract we all did.<p>Arrest them on board, handcuff them and lead them away in handcuffs at the destination. No sympathy from me, <i>especially</i> since the only way the handcuffs route is going to happen is if the passenger in questions ignores the instructions from the flight crew.<p>I also have to note that on most flights, whether domestic or international, the it&#x27;s <i>already</i> a criminal offence to ignore an instruction from the flight crew. The airline here did not <i>need</i> to make publish a new rule, they could have simply had the flight crew inform the annoying passenger.
    • standardUser1 minute ago
      The ones with limited recourse are the flight crew who are trapped with you and a hundred other asshole for hours with no escape and very limited options in case of a serious disruption. If there is one space that has justification to act as temporary dictatorship, it&#x27;s an aircraft in flight.
    • 0x3f27 minutes ago
      The airlines could alway remove you for literally any reason. Even if it was discriminatory or otherwise illegal, you&#x27;d still definitely be getting off the plane, at least.
    • leptons30 minutes ago
      You might blame the airlines, but passengers have become more rude and entitled year after year. It&#x27;s really everywhere now, not just on airplanes. I personally am fine with removing passengers who think they are entitled to annoy the rest of us when we can&#x27;t just get up and leave the place.<p>Edit: We seem to have entitled assholes in this thread, from the downvotes I&#x27;m getting.
  • austin-cheney26 minutes ago
    I agree with the policy but this is such a mild offense. Just a few years ago in the US there was an epidemic of drunk people savagely beating flight attendants.<p>People who cannot figure out how to share use of shared space should lose access to those places.
    • halapro12 minutes ago
      Yes and no. I don&#x27;t want to be a Karen, but also I think it&#x27;s fair to not cause discomfort to others. Imagine if every flight was as noisy a city intersection. For 5 hours. And you can&#x27;t hide.