5 comments

  • onli1 hour ago
    What a strange list. Many books I&#x27;d never expect to be listed, others I&#x27;d expect to be listed are missing. So I looked up the background and indeed it&#x27;s based on strange methodology, citing wikipedia: &quot;Starting from a preliminary list of 200 titles created by bookshops and journalists, 17,000 French participants responded to the question, &quot;Which books have stuck in your mind?&quot; (Quels livres sont restés dans votre mémoire?&quot;<p>Makes more sense like that.
    • kergonath20 minutes ago
      &gt; Many books I&#x27;d never expect to be listed, others I&#x27;d expect to be listed are missing<p>Most of them make sense to me. I don’t know some of them but then I don’t know everything. The methodology can be discussed (and indeed, a pre-selection of 200 books is at the same time a lot and not that much), but none of these lists can be perfect.<p>Out of curiosity, which one would you remove from the list, and which ones would you add?
    • jdsnape1 hour ago
      Out of interest, why does that seem a strange methodology?
      • onli1 hour ago
        When reading &quot;Books of the Century&quot; I expected a list of the most important, most influential or just best books. Skewed towards the french perspective, given Le Monde as a source. But this was never the goal, just a &quot;what stuck in your mind&quot; question.<p>For example, 1984 is missing, and Louis Begley Wartime Lies. And I wouldn&#x27;t have expected Ulysses in there given the french source, for me it was incomprehensible gibberish and I thought only the US ranks it high. But that gibberishness makes it certainly memorable, so given the question it fits.
        • jkingsbery57 minutes ago
          1984 is 22 on the list.
          • onli53 minutes ago
            Upps. Searching for 1984 didn&#x27;t turn it up.
        • Karuma57 minutes ago
          1984 is N°22 on that list...
      • hammock32 minutes ago
        Starting with only 200 titles in the survey, for a final list of 100, seems off to me for starters. Every book surveyed has a 50% chance of making “book of the century”
  • lovegrenoble1 hour ago
    More clean: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Le_Monde%27s_100_Books_of_the_Century" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Le_Monde%27s_100_Books_of_the_...</a>
  • haunter1 hour ago
    This should have an 1999 in the title even if the site and ebooks published are newer
  • orwin1 hour ago
    I don&#x27;t think I would place all of them in any &#x27;top&#x27; list, but all the books I have read, ~60%, are great read. Weird list though.
  • pcasca1 hour ago
    Infinite Jest?