I would think the term 'vibe coded', 'vibed', '100% vibes', etc would be far more appropriate and well known, than 'lorem ipsum' when it comes to generating code without reviewing the output.<p>If I saw that badge on someones github I would think it had something to do with lorem ipsum text generation, rather than anything to do with AI.
I created <a href="https://github.com/Entrpi/autonomy-golf" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Entrpi/autonomy-golf</a> and have been using it as a gamified development process.<p>The key insight was to not just handwave or guess at how much is automated, but make evaluation and review part of the continuous development loop. I first implemented in <a href="https://github.com/Entrpi/autoresearch-everywhere" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/Entrpi/autoresearch-everywhere</a> where I used it to deliberately automate more, in the spirit of Karpathy's upstream (and to very good effect. I have some of the best autoresearch results anywhere, and the platform is far more robust than it started).
A little ironic that the README, SPEC.md and the poster's comment here all smell of LLM writing!
(1) Why?<p>(2) The code I write with AI doesn’t fit on the scale.
Given the reality that there are a lot of people who [fairly or unfairly] judge anything that uses "AI" in a decisively negative way, what possible advantage is there in giving people a reason to dismiss your project without evaluating it on its own merits?
AIx is an open standard for disclosing AI involvement in software projects - expressed through the language of authorship. Not a judgment. Just transparency.
Neat idea. I like the five point scale