3 comments

  • 5o1ecist58 minutes ago
    I remember UMB. I remember that, as a teenager, I was obsessed with figuring out how to squeeze the most free conventional memory out of MS-DOS 6+ ... or 7+? I was stuck at around 615k, maybe 620ish. It annoyed me greatly, because I knew there was still headroom left.<p>The thing was, that upper memory wasn&#x27;t just for TSRs. Anything one can shove there, would happily stay there and run just fine.<p>My journey towards the most free, conventional memory ended at 637k on my 386 DX-33 with 8megs of RAM and a SoundBlaster card, with everything possible being shoved to high memory. Mouse driver, MSCDEX and even COMMAND.COM.<p>637k. So proud, much wow!<p>Good times!
    • mhd27 minutes ago
      I remember playing at least one game without the mouse, to save those precious KBs…
    • Zardoz8422 minutes ago
      I don&#x27;t remember the exact number, but I remember that using memmaker and some manual fine-tuning, was on the 620-63X range of conventional RAM.
    • MrBuddyCasino44 minutes ago
      637k is pretty good! There was an automated command in later DOS versions that would try to optimise memory, but I don&#x27;t think it got results as good.
      • einr30 minutes ago
        MEMMAKER. It was okay, but it was so invasive in modifying your CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT that I never really trusted it. I preferred hand-optimizing.
      • DaOne25631 minutes ago
        You mean memmaker
  • gschizas33 minutes ago
    &#x27;MZ&#x27; has been confirmed to be the initials of Mark Zbikowski, there&#x27;s no question about it. It&#x27;s not &quot;Memory&quot; + &quot;Last&quot;.
  • mlvljr58 minutes ago
    [dead]