4 comments

  • theodorejb5 minutes ago
    What benefit is an eye unless there is also the capability of processing and using the information? How would both evolve simultaneously?
    • doctoboggan1 minute ago
      A photosensitive patch of cells could be wired directly to motor cells/muscles on the opposite side, which would allow the organism to swim toward the light (maybe useful for feeding or migrating, etc.)
  • emmelaich1 hour ago
    Speculation 1. The bicameral mind was created as a result.<p>Speculation 2. The earliest creatures with two eyes may have been conjoined twins -- which were more successful in life than their single-celled&#x2F;bodied siblings.
  • marojejian9 hours ago
    Gift link:<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2026&#x2F;02&#x2F;23&#x2F;science&#x2F;evolution-vertebrate-eye.html?unlocked_article_code=1.OVA.Hdoe.X4H61oGgvbWs&amp;smid=url-share" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nytimes.com&#x2F;2026&#x2F;02&#x2F;23&#x2F;science&#x2F;evolution-vertebr...</a>
  • hinkley1 hour ago
    Don&#x27;t we have single celled organisms with more than one &#x27;eye&#x27; now?<p>We&#x27;ve been able to sense light and shadow even before we became multicellular, didn&#x27;t we? And this article seems to be implying rather otherwise.
    • emmelaich1 hour ago
      I was looking for that too. I&#x27;m sure I&#x27;ve read that single cell animals were sensitive to light (and&#x2F;or heat). I guess it&#x27;s a speculation though, because we&#x27;d have no physical evidence.
      • hinkley1 hour ago
        We know that modern flagellates can steer to or away from light. When they started doing that is, as you say, pretty difficult to establish since they haven&#x27;t left archaeological evidence. Unlike shellfish.