The productivity gains from AI are real but unevenly distributed. In my experience, the biggest wins come from automating the "small" stuff — email triage, scheduling, reminders, follow-ups — not from replacing entire job functions.<p>I built an AI secretary for myself that handles these admin tasks, and it saves me ~12 hours/week. The interesting pattern: knowledge workers who delegate well to AI see outsized gains, while those who treat it as a fancy search engine get marginal improvements.<p>The EU study's 4% average makes sense when you factor in adoption friction, training gaps, and companies bolting AI onto broken workflows. The real productivity leap happens when you redesign processes around AI capabilities, not just layer them on top.
You trust these stochastic text/slot machines for scheduling and follow-ups? Human intention is important for both of these. triage and reminders I can see, but if you send me an llm generated follow up, I'm just going to assume you don't care.
One process redesign that may be considered a moat for AI is employees intending to communicate through a sentence or two first passing the text into their AI of choice and asking it to elaborate. On the other end the colleague uses their AI to summarize the email into a bullet point or two. It's challenging for those that don't use AI to keep up.
I wonder if web searches used to be pretty productive, then declined as sponsored results and SEO degraded things.<p>Nowadays an ai assist with a web search usually eliminates the search altogether and gives you a clear answer right away.<p>for example, "how much does a ford f-150 cost" will give you something ballpark in a second, compared to annoying "research" to find the answer shrouded in corporate obfuscation.
The turning point was around when google stopped honoring Boolean ops and quotation marks
I was just thinking exactly the same. Basic web search has become so horrible that AI is being used as its replacement.<p>I found it a sad condemnation of how far the tech industry has fallen into enshittification and is failing to provide tools that are actually useful.
We always had the technology to do things better, it's the money making part that has made things worse technologically speaking. In this same way, I don't see how AI will resolve the problem - our productivity was never the goal, and that won't change any time soon.
And it'll happen again when AI models start resorting to ads once again.
AI is beneficial, has no negative effects and must be pushed forward at all costs! The world pre-2020 was a dark, poor dystopia as opposed to the flourishing economy in the EU post 2022.<p>Brought to you by the European Investment Bank and WEF members:<p><a href="https://www.weforum.org/stories/authors/debora-revoltella/" rel="nofollow">https://www.weforum.org/stories/authors/debora-revoltella/</a>
FWIW, these studies are too early. Large orgs have very sensitive data privacy considerations and they're only right now going through the evaluation cycles.<p>Case in point, this past week, I learned Deloitte only recently gave the approval in picking Gemini as their AI platform. Rollout hasn't even begun yet which you can imagine is going to take a while.<p>To say "AI is failing to deliver" because only 4% efficiency increase is a pre-mature conclusion.
I'm not sure this is even measuring LLMs in the first place! They say the definition is "big data analytics and AI".<p>Is putting Google Analytics onto your website and pulling a report 'big data analytics'...?
Exactly, my company started carefully dipping their toes in to org wide AI mid last year (IT has been experimenting earlier than that, but under pretty strict guidelines from infosec). There is so much compliance and data privacy considerations involved.<p>And for the record I think they are absolutely right to be cautious, a mistake in my industry can be disastrous so a considered approach to integrating this stuff is absolutely warranted. Most established companies outside of tech really can’t have the “move fast break things” mindset.
Meanwhile, "shadow" AI use is around 90%. And if you guess IT would lead the pack on that, you are wrong. It's actually sales and hr that are the most avid unsactioned AI tool users.
Yes I was recently talking to a person who was working as a BA who specializes in corporate AI adoption- they didn’t realize you could post screenshots to ChatGPT<p>These are not the openclaw folks
Its depressing when people are hearing managers are openly asking all employees to pitch in ideals for AI in order to reduce employee headcount.<p>For those hearing this at work, better prepare an exit plan.
You know it's a EU study because they bring up "AI patents" in the first 2 minutes of it, as if they mean anything
AI is affecting everything the same as Covid, as we've been in one single-topic hysteria since 2020. With one short break for attaching bottle caps to their bottles.<p>Not even Russian invasion or collapse of their automotive industry rattled them.
[dead]