6 comments

  • netsharc55 minutes ago
    &gt; Private fertility clinics began offering what&#x27;s known as crypto preservation to servicemen and women in 2022 at the start of Russia&#x27;s full-scale invasion.<p>I&#x27;m pretty certain it&#x27;s &quot;cryo&quot; and not &quot;crypto&quot;. Am I wrong, or has the BBC&#x27;s standards slipped so badly?
    • giantg234 minutes ago
      Genetics live in the block chain now
    • copperx40 minutes ago
      I assumed the servicemen&#x27;s identities were obfuscated.
  • fhdkweig55 minutes ago
    The United States military was apparently interested in the idea in a 2022 article, although I can&#x27;t find any recent information on it.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qz.com&#x2F;610131&#x2F;the-us-military-will-pay-for-soldiers-to-freeze-their-eggs-and-sperm" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;qz.com&#x2F;610131&#x2F;the-us-military-will-pay-for-soldiers-...</a><p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.progress.org.uk&#x2F;us-military-to-offer-egg-and-sperm-freezing-to-service-members&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.progress.org.uk&#x2F;us-military-to-offer-egg-and-spe...</a>
    • eurleif39 minutes ago
      And Israel has been freezing soldiers&#x27; sperm post-mortem: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;2026&#x2F;01&#x2F;18&#x2F;nx-s1-5658287&#x2F;families-of-israeli-soldiers-killed-in-gaza-are-retreiving-sperm-from-their-bodies" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.npr.org&#x2F;2026&#x2F;01&#x2F;18&#x2F;nx-s1-5658287&#x2F;families-of-isr...</a>
  • powerpcmac35 minutes ago
    Here&#x27;s how Ukraine can still win
  • notepad0x901 hour ago
    what is the point? genetic diversity? women and the length of pregnancy is the limiting bottleneck. Men can have kids very late, and from what I heard, only a certain top percentage of sperm donors&#x27; products get picked.
    • coryrc4 minutes ago
      Russians torture and mutilate their prisoners. If they get caught, they likely will not be returned with their gonads intact.<p>Is this a war crime? Yes. Is the rest of world letting it happen or actively abetting? It is!
    • roysting56 minutes ago
      It might even just be a cynical motivation to with zero actual intent on using it. Men under pressure to be thrown into the meat grinder will be more encouraged and motivated if they believe their legacy can continue even without what they know is a death sentence.
      • eaglelamp23 minutes ago
        &gt; The politicians&#x27; initial efforts caused a public outcry though, when they stipulated that all samples should be destroyed on a donor&#x27;s death.<p>Looks like you&#x27;re right.
      • copperx40 minutes ago
        A cheap morale booster.
    • ars56 minutes ago
      No, the bottleneck is the <i>desire to have children</i>. Unless you are planning to force the women, you need policies (such as these) that encourage them to <i>want</i> children.
    • dismalaf58 minutes ago
      Maybe Ukrainian women want to have kids with their partners who are soldiers? Morale boost, probably a higher willingness to fight to the possible death if you know there&#x27;s a chance your genes will survive...<p>It&#x27;s about more than simply having anyone&#x27;s children...
    • rngfnby50 minutes ago
      There will be a million women without mates by the end of this war.<p>Its a crude solution that is deemed more acceptable than polygamy or, shudder the thought, peace negotiations.
      • jmye44 minutes ago
        So easy to demand they cede territory for “peace” from your couch in Austin. But hey, I get it. Breitbart said they should.
        • constrictyuslf31 minutes ago
          Some ukarians would probably prefer to be on a couch too, even if it&#x27;s West of the donbass, but not like they have a choice about martial law or conscription or the suspension of voting, but hey just some details right?
        • rngfnby41 minutes ago
          Why not let Ukrainians decide if they want to take land? Have elections. A referendum.
          • jmye38 minutes ago
            <i>yawn</i> More obvious bullshit and agitprop. You’re not fooling anyone.
  • SanjayMehta1 hour ago
    [flagged]
    • whynotmaybe1 hour ago
      Interesting choice of word to describe a country trying to survive against an aggressor that started the war
      • freefrog33443352 minutes ago
        The civil war began in 2014, after the Maidan coup. Donesk was shelled for 8 years by the Ukrainians.
        • dralley45 minutes ago
          It&#x27;s not a civil war if it was started by Russian special forces and continued with Russian soldiers, &quot;advisors&quot; and weapons.<p>It was far closer to an actual invasion than it was to any form of uprising.
        • mint540 minutes ago
          That sure is a peculiar way to talk about the large number of clandestine Russian troops that were sent into donesk to take it over in 2014.
        • minihoster41 minutes ago
          Yeah and the rebels just found those T-72B3 tanks in storage somewhere. lmfao
      • jesterson56 minutes ago
        Interesting choice of words to reduce complicated conflict to a black and white situation.<p>You forgot to add &quot;unprovoked aggression&quot; to fully regurgitate mass media cliches.
        • whynotmaybe19 minutes ago
          Colour me as old fashion but in my book when a country invades another, it&#x27;s an aggression.<p>Especially when the one that started it seems inclined to target civilians that they supposedly want to help. Unless you also consider this a &quot;mass media cliché&quot;.
        • netsharc52 minutes ago
          Pray tell, why is it &quot;complicated&quot;? And what&#x27;s the situation behind the cliche that you&#x27;re &quot;more educated&quot; in?
  • dyauspitr1 hour ago
    What a waste of life. Why hasn’t someone taken out Putin, is it really that hard? It can’t possibly be that hard for a state.
    • ars57 minutes ago
      A state can do it, but it might fail, and the result of a failure would be a catastrophe so everyone is very cautious.
    • wonderwonder24 minutes ago
      You think the war ends if they kill Putin? Medvedev would very likely nuke Kiev 30 minutes later.
      • dyauspitr13 minutes ago
        I seriously doubt it. You have to be absolutely bonkers to start nuclear war over one person. Russia is insane but not suicidal.
    • rngfnby45 minutes ago
      And then you get Medvedev. His finger is so itchy for the red button he has to rub it with vagisil.<p>At a certain point we have to understand that Putin is about the most pro-Western person left in Russia.
      • GolfPopper17 minutes ago
        &gt;<i>Putin is about the most pro-Western person left in Russia.</i><p>Appearing more sane than Putin while simultaneously being in a position to plausibly serve as Putin&#x27;s successor is likely to be fatal.
    • subjectsigma1 hour ago
      Ok sure, you go try it! Just remember that even if you succeed, the consequences may be everyone you know and love dying in nuclear fire.
    • jesterson59 minutes ago
      [flagged]
      • dismalaf55 minutes ago
        Zelenskyy could die tomorrow and Ukraine would keep fighting. Your brain&#x27;s been melted by Russian propaganda.
        • mint543 minutes ago
          This post’s comments has seen a special military operation or something, it’s straight up Soviet radio in here
          • minihoster39 minutes ago
            big uptick in authoritarian bootlicking in this place unfortunately
        • rngfnby43 minutes ago
          Who walked away from the Istanbul offer and killed their negotiating team? There&#x27;s no better outcome for Ukraine than that offer, plus a million dead.<p>Thank you Boris Johnson.
        • jesterson51 minutes ago
          &gt; Zelenskyy could die tomorrow and Ukraine would keep fighting<p>That&#x27;s your delusion and it has nothing to do with reality. Take out their army &quot;recruiters&quot; grabbing and beating people on streets, and there will be noone to fight anymore. No need even to take out zelenski.<p>&gt; Your brain&#x27;s been melted by Russian propaganda.<p>How predictable lol. So happy your &quot;brain&quot; is not melted by anything.
          • fhdkweig42 minutes ago
            The Ukraine conscription age is 25. If they were desperate for soldiers it would be lowered. It was 18 for the United States in the Vietnam war. Definitely wouldn&#x27;t be grabbing people off the streets.
          • jmye42 minutes ago
            &gt; Take out their army &quot;recruiters&quot; grabbing and beating people on streets<p>He says, and then unironically whines about being called propaganda.
    • technate4eva1 hour ago
      [flagged]
    • brandonmenc1 hour ago
      Yes, it is difficult to take out the leader of a world nuclear world power.<p>Especially one as shrewd as Putin. Especially when you&#x27;re expecting the EU to do it. Not sure why this is a surprise.<p>The world is not an action film.
      • rngfnby37 minutes ago
        This.<p>Never mind that they tried a month ago with the drone attacks.<p>How would this work exactly? The most protected person in the world, thousands of km from hostile borders, in the city with the world best AD surrounded, by bureaucrats who, if anything, think Putin is too soft on the West.