3 comments

  • lefra4 hours ago
    There&#x27;s several ussues with this argument:<p>- If the interference pattern was explained by diffraction by a semi-infinite plane, why don&#x27;t I see it when using only one finger? I only see a blurry shadow. The second finger is needed to make the pattern appear.<p>- All formulas that are used compute the light intensity projected on a screen. In the actual experiment, we&#x27;re looking at the slit through a lens (our eye or a camera). That&#x27;s not the same thing.<p>- The fact that this is white light interference is handwaved away. To model it correctly, you&#x27;d need to compute what happens at each wavelength, then integrate the resulting spectrum multiplied by CIE&#x27;s x, y z functions at each point, and finally do a bunch of math to bring that in the sRGB color space if you want to display the model&#x27;s result on a screen.
    • Snoozus3 hours ago
      -I do see it on the edge of a single finger.<p>-I agree, also I can only observe the effect when focusing on the gap<p>-sure, but weirdly the effect has to be wavelength dependent, but there are no color fringes.<p>I think this is something else, but haven&#x27;t figured it out yet.
      • lefra2 hours ago
        Interesting, I can only see the bands when holding my fingers very close to my eye, and _not_ focussing on it. If I hold my fingers far enough to be able to focus, I don&#x27;t see them. Maybe my eyesight is not good enough. Focussing on a single finger, I see that the border has a green tint to it.<p>I agree that there&#x27;s no colour in the fringes, which is unexpected for white light interference.
  • kelseyfrog5 hours ago
    Slightly related, if you move such a slit or similarly a pinhole at the same distance, you can see your own retinal vasculature. It&#x27;s only visible if the hole moves because it presumably triggers the motion contrast neurons.
  • dark-star2 hours ago
    I don&#x27;t think telling people to directly look into sunlight is good advice