> Yet many people persist in calling aluminum foil "tinfoil."<p>> We chemists get annoyed at things like that.<p>> Now, about aluminum foil.<p>Actually, most chemists are profoundly annoyed at the Americans' inability to spell aluminium properly...
> Actually, most chemists are profoundly annoyed at the Americans' inability to spell aluminium properly...<p>That's just patently false. Anyone who's had any sort of education in chemistry/physics is aware of the history of the word and doesn't give a damn.
Sir Humphry Davy first isolated the stuff and he called it aluminum, so that's good enough for me.
Try to make them pronounce nuclear instead of nucelar :D
It isn't clear if that is a dig at Americans having their own spelling of aluminum/aluminium, or ignorance that Americans have their own spelling.
IUPAC recognizes both spellings.<p>Also, speak up, we can't hear you from all the way up here ON THE MOON.
> can't hear you from all the way up here ON THE MOON.<p><i>cough</i><p><a href="https://www.quora.com/What-does-the-German-phrase-Hinter-dem-Mond-leben-translate-into-and-mean-in-English" rel="nofollow">https://www.quora.com/What-does-the-German-phrase-Hinter-dem...</a>
It's cold and lonely here on the moon. -- Jonathan Coulton
Did visiting the moon damage your hearing? Last I checked there haven’t been any Americans on the moon for over half a century.<p>Perhaps if you used the metric system…
...and the SAE system like me (older American here) then you would be able to provide the answers that confuse your audience the most when they ask about volumes, velocities, dimensions, etc. and you would have as much fun in life as I have had. Your metric system is for people who need to have things simplified in order for them to be understandable and relatable. It's about as dumbed down as you can make something. Lowest common denominator type stuff. Americans have always thrived on challenge and that is why we stupidly cling to the complexity of the SAE system of units. It fits so we sits.
They do use the metric system at NASA maybe that’s why they haven’t been back to the moon.