4 comments

  • bisonbear2 hours ago
    Intuitively makes sense, but in my experience, a more realistic workflow is using the main agent to sub-agent delegation pattern instead of straight 7x-ing token costs.<p>By delegating to sub agents (eg for brainstorming or review), you can break out of local maxima while not using quite as many more tokens.<p>Additionally, when doing any sort of complex task, I do research -&gt; plan -&gt; implement -&gt; review, clearing context after each stage. In that case, would I want to make 7x research docs, 7x plans, etc.? probably not. Instead, a more prudent use of tokens might be to have Claude do research+planning, and have Codex do a review of that plan prior to implementation.
    • girvo1 hour ago
      &gt; straight 7x-ing token costs<p>You are probably right, but my work pays for as many tokens as I want, which opens up a bunch of tactics that otherwise would be untenable.<p>I stick with sub-agent approaches outside of work for this reason though, which is more than fair a point
  • jmalicki3 hours ago
    Is this going to get my Claude subscription cancelled if I run it with a claude backend, given that it&#x27;s orchestrating the CLI? I am still a little unclear about the boundaries of that.
  • tomtom13374 hours ago
    Any suggestions for «orchestrating» this type of experiment?<p>And how does one compare the results in a way that is easy to parse? 7 models producing 1 PR each is one way, but it doesn’t feel very easy to compare such.
  • fph2 hours ago
    AI is like XML: if it doesn&#x27;t solve your problem, you are not using enough of it.