4 comments

  • yesiamyourdad54 minutes ago
    I saw this about 20 years ago in an exhibition at the Denver Library. I&#x27;d wondered how they really knew who the real people behind the characters were, it turns out that Kerouac didn&#x27;t change any names at first so it&#x27;s right in the manuscript.<p>I&#x27;d heard about it from a friend in the mid-80s, this friend was an aspiring writer and he mentioned OTR but then was musing about his new word processor typewriter, saying that he felt like the need to physically change pages added breaks to his writing process and he was worried that with the basically infinite page on the word processor it would be too easy to write crap. I wish I had a way to look this guy up and get his take on writing today.
    • bee_rider27 minutes ago
      Did you forget his name? Or is your author friend not online?
  • Luc1 hour ago
    Not the first time, it was auctioned in 2001: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.christies.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;lot&#x2F;lot-2053069" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.christies.com&#x2F;en&#x2F;lot&#x2F;lot-2053069</a><p>I noticed the lack of glue and yellowed tape. Actually it consists of strips of paper that are 12 foot long, taped together.
  • 6stringmerc1 hour ago
    Does it come with amphetamines to go with the experience?
  • tehjoker1 hour ago
    It&#x27;s hard for me to understand how stuff like this isn&#x27;t in a national museum.
    • fsckboy1 hour ago
      FTA: <i>This scroll is one of the most important literary documents still in private hands.</i><p>and: <i>However, the return of the scroll to the auction block echoes an earlier controversy. In 2001, when the manuscript was last offered for sale, Carolyn Cassady – the former wife of Neal Cassady, the real-life inspiration for the novel’s Dean Moriarty – denounced the auction as “blasphemy”, arguing that the scroll belonged in a public library rather than a private collection. “Jack loved public libraries,” she said at the time, adding: “If they auction it, anybody rich could buy it and keep it out of sight.”</i>
      • Telemakhos23 minutes ago
        If it&#x27;s in a library, it&#x27;s going to be in special collections, and nobody&#x27;s going to see it. It will be preserved and kept safe for the rare scholar who has a legitimate need to see the original, but for most purposes the archetype is never needed. We don&#x27;t have the archetype of Vergil&#x27;s Aeneid, but it&#x27;s well studied nonetheless.<p>If it&#x27;s in a private collection, a scholar who really, really needs to see it might make an arrangement with the owner. For everyone else, though, there are copies at the local bookstore. Bonus, though: if it&#x27;s in a private collection, there&#x27;s a chance that it physically is in a library. Some private collections are housed inside public (usually university) library special collections. From the investor&#x27;s standpoint, it&#x27;s worth it to have professionals who know preservation keeping the book in climate-controlled, reasonably secure facilities.
    • KaiserPro1 hour ago
      Its because there is more than one draft.<p>Yes, this is the iconic version, but the whole point of Kerouac is that its &quot;jazz&quot; and improvised, despite the published novel being at least 6 drafts different<p>Not to mention the french version, and the previous attempts at the novel.