3 comments

  • foobarbecue2 hours ago
    I don't even understand what discipline we're talking about here. Can someone provide some background please?
    • Nevermark1 hour ago
      &gt; Quenching is higher-frequency pressure application that amplifies contradictions and internal inconsistencies.<p>&gt; At each step, stress increments are computed from measurable terms such as alignment and proximity to a verified substrate.<p>Well obviously its ... uh, ...<p>It may not be, but the whole description reads as category error satire to me.
      • verhash1 hour ago
        Not satire, though I get why the terminology looks odd. The language comes from materials science because the math is the same: deterministic state updates with hard thresholds. In most AI systems, exclusion relies on probabilistic sampling (temperature, top-k, nucleus), which means you can’t replay decisions exactly. This explores whether exclusion can be implemented as a deterministic state machine instead—same input, same output, verifiable by hash.<p>“Mechanical” is literal here: like a beam fracturing when stress exceeds a yield point (σ &gt; σᵧ), candidates fracture when accumulated constraint pressure crosses a threshold. No randomness, no ranking. If that framing is wrong, the easiest way to test it is to run the code or the HF Space and see whether identical parameters actually do produce identical hashes.
  • gwern25 minutes ago
    OK, this is AI slop (&quot;fracture&quot; alone gives it away). But maybe there&#x27;s still something of value here? Can you explain it in actual human terms, give a real example, and explain what you did to test this and why I shouldn&#x27;t flag this like I did <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=46701114">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=46701114</a> ?