5 comments

  • omnicognate2 hours ago
    An important aspect of this for professional programmers is that learning is not something that happens as a beginner, student or &quot;junior&quot; and then stops. The <i>job</i> is learning, and after 25 years of doing it I learn more per day than ever.
    • cyclotron3k1 hour ago
      I&#x27;ve reached a steady state where the rate of learning matches the rate of forgetting
      • TeMPOraL1 hour ago
        That&#x27;s one of several possibilities. I&#x27;ve reached a different steady state - one where the velocity of work exceeds the rate at which I can learn enough to fully understand the task at hand.
      • bryanrasmussen1 hour ago
        to fix that you basically need to switch specialty or focus. A difficult thing to do if you are employed of course.
    • dude25071122 minutes ago
      <i>&gt; The job is learning...</i><p>I could have sworn I was meant to be <i>shipping</i> all this time...
  • dr_dshiv2 hours ago
    Go Anthropic for transparency and commitment to science.<p>Personally, I’ve never been learning software development <i>concepts</i> faster—but that’s because I’ve been offloading actual development to other people for years.
  • qweiopqweiop47 minutes ago
    It makes sense - juniors are coding faster but not understanding anything. Ironically it&#x27;ll stop them getting more experienced despite feeling good. What I&#x27;m interested in is if the same applies for Senior+ developers. The soft signals are that people are feeling the atrophy but who knows...
    • renegade-otter28 minutes ago
      It requires discipline. I use LLMs for mind-numbing refactoring and things I don&#x27;t care learning. If you want to learn something, you do it yourself. It&#x27;s like the gym. No pain, no gain.<p>I am not saying you should be struggling performatively, like a person still proud in 2026 that they are still using Vim for large projects (good for you, eh), but sometimes you need to embrace the discomfort.
  • keeda1 hour ago
    Another study from 2024 with similar findings: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mdpi.com&#x2F;2076-3417&#x2F;14&#x2F;10&#x2F;4115" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.mdpi.com&#x2F;2076-3417&#x2F;14&#x2F;10&#x2F;4115</a> -- a bit more preliminary, but conducted with undergrad students still learning to program, so I expect the effect would be even more pronounced.<p>This similarly indicates that reliance on LLM correlates with degraded performance in critical problem-solving, coding and debugging skills. On the bright side, using LLMs as a supplementary learning aid (e.g. clarifying doubts) showed no negative impact on critical skills.<p>This is why I&#x27;m skeptical of people excited about &quot;AI native&quot; junior employees coming in and revamping the workplace. I haven&#x27;t yet seen any evidence that AI can be effectively harnessed without some domain expertise, and I&#x27;m seeing mounting evidence that relying too much on it hinders building that expertise.<p>I think those who wish to become experts in a domain would willingly eschew using AI in their chosen discipline until they&#x27;ve &quot;built the muscles.&quot;
  • MzxgckZtNqX5i2 hours ago
    Duplicate?<p>Submission about the arXiv pre-print: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=46821360">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=46821360</a>