9 comments

  • ActionRetro3 days ago
    In case the single floppy disk running everything fails: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20260129015513&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;floppy.ddns.net&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20260129015513&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;floppy.ddn...</a>
    • armenarmen1 hour ago
      Watching the video now! Your stuff all rules btw
  • VoidWhisperer1 hour ago
    Seems to be timing out for me (not necessarily surprising, given that it is a floppy disk and HN has a history of hugging sites to death)<p>Archive link incase people want to see the page but can&#x27;t load it: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20260129015513&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;floppy.ddns.net&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;web.archive.org&#x2F;web&#x2F;20260129015513&#x2F;http:&#x2F;&#x2F;floppy.ddn...</a>
  • wowczarek1 hour ago
    All the way up to 2004 or 2005, my home router was an old 486dx box running FREESCO (<a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freesco.info&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;freesco.info&#x2F;</a>) - and it was, indeed, booting from a single floppy. Linux 2.0.something.<p>To my surprise I discovered today that FREESCO was still releasing updates all the way until 2014.
  • accrual3 hours ago
    Perhaps no floppy drive has ever had so many patiently waiting for it to complete its work.
    • bot4033 hours ago
      If you like this you&#x27;ll love the web server on tape. Navigation forward works great but if you hit the back button it takes a while to rewind.
  • reconnecting4 hours ago
    Hope the hn post doesn&#x27;t result in a bad sector on this floppy.
    • GeorgeTirebiter1 hour ago
      Interesting history, which does seem to be true: In the Beginning, the reliability of floppies was really quite good. Over time, as the mass market developed, however, quality went down as people shaved pennies and fractions of pennies. Storied brands such as Sony ended up being bad sector magnets (well, you know what I mean...).<p>My big secret for those of us still using floppies (USB floppies are a steal!) --- get Maxell NOS; they&#x27;re about $3 per diskette now, but I have beat them hard and they keep going. Of course, I also had a batch of poorly-stored floppies that would not even turn (!) from one vendor (cheap, tho...) and they almost ruined one drive.<p>My rule now is: once a single sector goes kaput, make a new working copy from your backup (you HAVE a backup, right???), mark the bad sector of the failed disk, and put it in the &#x27;BAD&#x27; pile. I have not yet had a sector on a Maxell 1.44 diskette go bad. Several SONY diskettes however are in that pile.<p>Note that the head drags on the surface of a floppy, so you&#x27;re always losing a little; what that closeness does, tho, is allow phenomenal bits-per-square-inch. The coatings are very good, binders are good, magnetic properties are excellent. And the head widths (both sides, after all) are small. So you get formatted 80 cylinders of 18,432 bytes per cylinder MSDOS-compatible capacity, at that 5 revolutions per second ( 300 RPM, but gosh, RPS is a better unit here...) speed.<p>The floppy drive is an incredible chunk of engineering. It&#x27;s unfortunate that Zip 100 and Zip 250 arrived so relatively late in the game.
  • pengaru11 minutes ago
    In my teens I ran a combination ipmasq(NAT, this was back when we called it ip masquerading) firewall and dial-up POP for my girlfriend at the time off a scrap 386 motherboard some ISA NICs and a 3.5&quot; 1.44MB floppy drive. It was packed full of SIMMs, I don&#x27;t remember how much probably 8MB RAM.<p>The userspace was all in the initramfs, linux booted directly without any LILO or grub (this was back in the days the kernel included its own boot loader), and the floppy drive was totally out of the picture once the system was up and running from RAM.<p>Prior to adding the dial-up aspect for my gf to share my internet from home, the init was deliberately exited which technically panicked the kernel. Basically it was a &#x2F;linuxrc shell script setting up the networking then deliberately breaking userspace - not even PID1 existed while it was just my firewall. The kernel keeps doing networking stuff even if panicked.<p>Fun times.
  • WesolyKubeczek2 hours ago
    I also remember this amazing tiny thing, tomsrtbt. It was packed full of tools, and also had an http server in it.
  • KellyCriterion5 hours ago
    720 kb SD or 1.44 MB DD ?<p>:-D
    • wumms3 hours ago
      Sorry, nitpick: 720kB DD 1.44MB HD
      • LeoPanthera34 minutes ago
        It&#x27;s funny that we&#x27;ve always called them &quot;1.44 MB&quot; disks when they actually hold 1440 KiB, which is 1.41 MiB or 1.47 MB.<p>&quot;1.44&quot; is a horrible mix of binary kilo and decimal mega which makes no sense.
      • KellyCriterion2 hours ago
        ++1<p>:))
    • geerlingguy4 hours ago
      One could cheat and run a SuperDisk drive, with 120 MB! Though that&#x27;s not in the spirit of the game.
      • KellyCriterion2 hours ago
        but do you remember ZIP-drives? :-) (was that the name?)
        • vee-kay1 hour ago
          Yes! Superfloppy!<p>Iomega&#x27;s awesome Zip drive disk (100MB, 250MB, 750MB capacities) , I think I still have a 250MB zip drive somewhere in my home attic.<p>They required a dedicated zip drive (took up same sized slot&#x2F;bay as a floppy disk drive), but (if I recall right) that drive was backward compatible standard 3&amp;1⁄2-inch 1.44MB floppy disks.<p>Interestingly, these drive also came in variants to work with different types of interfaces: IDE, ATAPI, USB, SCSI, FireWire.<p>Zip drives filled the portable storage niche, until CDs and DVDs replaced their need.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Zip_drive" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Zip_drive</a><p>I found it cool that floppies and superfloppies had label stickers on which we can write (with a sketch pen) to remind the user of what content the disk is intended for.<p>There were some nice cameras that used Zip disks for storage! Very convenient for photographers working on multiple projects or sessions.<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.digitalkameramuseum.de&#x2F;en&#x2F;prototypes-rarities&#x2F;item&#x2F;zipcam" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.digitalkameramuseum.de&#x2F;en&#x2F;prototypes-rarities&#x2F;it...</a>
        • entangledqubit1 hour ago
          Yes. Along with the feared click of death.
        • ErroneousBosh39 minutes ago
          I have a bunch of them, some SCSI ones in old samplers.
      • wowczarek1 hour ago
        Hey, my oscilloscope has one of those!
    • reaperducer4 hours ago
      720k? In my day floppy disks had 96K and we liked it!
      • KellyCriterion2 hours ago
        this was 8.25&quot; back then?
        • GeorgeTirebiter1 hour ago
          RX-01 DEC &#x2F; IBM 3740 compatible was 77 tracks, single-sided, 128 bytes per sector and 26 sectors per track. Total 256,256 bytes. FM Modulation. 360 RPM. Disk to drive buffer: 4 µsec per data bit. Track-to-Track Seek: 6 ms. Head Settle Time: 25 ms. Average Access: Approximately 262 ms. 8&quot; diameter diskette<p>One of these was used to load the microcode into the VAX-11&#x2F;780 upon boot.
          • ErroneousBosh37 minutes ago
            My old PDP11&#x2F;73 (now in a museum) had two RX02, never had an RX01. Surprisingly fast! It also had two RL02s and a couple of RD54s in.<p>Building an RT11 system disk onto an RL02 off another RL02 made the downstairs neighbours complain quite a lot, even though the floor slab in my flat was about 40cm thick concrete. They didn&#x27;t muck about with these 1960s tower blocks but it was no match for a pair of pint glass sized head actuators and a pair of washing machine motors.
      • accrual3 hours ago
        I liked when floppy disks were actually floppy.
        • gschizas2 hours ago
          3.5&quot; floppies are still floppy. The case may be hard, but the floppy flops.