The 'a' and the 'o' are a bit similar, but all in all I can see myself trying this out. Reminds me a bit of Comic Code and Maple Mono. Thanks for sharing!<p>There are a few odd things about this post though. Take this as well-intentioned feedback.<p>- New account. No previous submissions or comments.<p>- New Github account. No previous activity.<p>- Mentions custom engine (cool!), but omits any details.<p>- Calls other mono fonts 'fugly'; refuses to elaborate.<p>- Releasing based on interest feels like engagement farming. Let me know when it's done. Then I'll judge whether I'm interested.<p>- Regular weights are free. Implication is that other weights will be paid. That's fine. I'm happy to pay for fonts. But I'm unlikely to try a font in earnest without bold and italics.<p>Sorry if this comes off as harsh. I wish you the best with this!
I find the "i" quite excruciating to look at.<p>Also would like to see more examples, say including this deep math.
Is this related: <a href="https://www.paratype.com/fonts/pt/xenia" rel="nofollow">https://www.paratype.com/fonts/pt/xenia</a> ?
Could you share more information on this custom python procedural engine?
I would suggest making the screenshot with the font at different sizes. They first thing I want is to have an approximation of how it will look at small sizes.
Why do this rather than just using METAFONT/METAPOST/METATYPE1?