8 comments

  • DustinEchoes3 days ago
    Might as well just link directly to the blog post: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;essenceia.github.io&#x2F;projects&#x2F;blake2s_hashing_accelerator_a_solo_tapeout_journey&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;essenceia.github.io&#x2F;projects&#x2F;blake2s_hashing_acceler...</a>
    • random_duck3 days ago
      Good suggestion, fell free to post it since you have more karma.
  • killingtime7420 hours ago
    I know he jokes that running a marathon is theoretically possible with running shoes, it really isn&#x27;t too hard though with programs like Couch to 5km <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;c25k.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;c25k.com&#x2F;</a>. Multiple members of family have run marathons from as little as 6 months from nothing.
  • edg500019 hours ago
    This is very interesting, for someone not involved in doing chip design, it&#x27;s very interesting to get an idea of the open source landscape. Very exiting. I like the idea of consolidating some power electronics and logic into a single chip at some point, for example a BLDC driver with embedded MOSFETs, gate drivers and MCU. But this is a pipe dream for now. But I know it&#x27;s possible.<p>I already see single-chip battery chargers (admittedly a lot simpler) that do both the charging logic (constant current until setpoint, then constant voltage until current drops below configured threshold).<p>A lot of stuff could be consolidated into single chips, making PCBs smaller and simplyfing designs.
    • mlsu19 hours ago
      The issue with consolidating a BLDC driver is thermals more than anything else, right? Much easier to keep the MOSFETs cool if they aren&#x27;t packed in on chip. Plus you can customize their size to the load.
  • 152334H19 hours ago
    It is a bit misleading to say &#x27;Solo&#x27;, when TinyTapeout is involved.<p>Still clearly effortful work, though. I don&#x27;t want to disparage it.
  • kam22 hours ago
    See also Luke Wren&#x27;s Mastodon thread on taping out a RISC-V chip in two weeks: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;types.pl&#x2F;@wren6991&#x2F;115572086565318699" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;types.pl&#x2F;@wren6991&#x2F;115572086565318699</a>
  • Neywiny22 hours ago
    RP2040 is not new. A bit odd to say it is. I then thought maybe this was from a few years ago, but it&#x27;s not, so idk
  • immibis18 hours ago
    I keep subconsciously dismissing TinyTapeout because the time horizon is so long and I don&#x27;t have a cool project idea that requires an ASIC, but it&#x27;s probably a really good idea to do uncool things that don&#x27;t require ASICs, to become familiar with the process and be able to do cool things later eventually. (Libre Hardware phone, anyone?)
  • dfajgljsldkjag23 hours ago
    Very cool but I stopped reading when I realized that the blog post was written by an LLM.<p>&gt; These weren’t just inconveniences; they fundamentally shaped the architecture, capping performance more than any internal logic constraints.<p>This sentence sealed the deal for me but I was already suspicious for the preceeding sections.