> Source: company statements<p>Meanwhile they are dumping thousands of cars in public parking lots: <a href="https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/byd-australia-accused-of-stockpiling-cars-illegally" rel="nofollow">https://www.carexpert.com.au/car-news/byd-australia-accused-...</a><p>And BYD sits on a pile of debt they use to pay suppliers expecting ever-increasing sales (Evergrande business model). <a href="https://medium.com/@davidsehyeonbaek/a-deep-dive-into-byds-suspicious-financial-engineering-b47381f476e8" rel="nofollow">https://medium.com/@davidsehyeonbaek/a-deep-dive-into-byds-s...</a>
BYD owns their own fleet of car carriers for export, with the capacity to have ~30k vehicles shipping to other markets at any one time on their vessels. From this piece:<p>> BYD Deliveries outside of China hit 1.05 million in 2025. The company has set a goal to expand overseas sales to between 1.5 million to 1.6 million units in 2026, according to a Citigroup Inc. report in November that cited a meeting with BYD management.<p>Edit: The debt is irrelevant, China isn’t America. They’ll nationalize and inflate away any institutional debt or wipe it out, but still have a third of the world’s manufacturing capacity. Tesla exists on vibes, Chinese EV makers build, for example. jmyeet’s comment mostly nails this: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46456020">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46456020</a><p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46424124">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46424124</a> (citations)<p>(global light vehicle TAM is ~90M units/year, and Chinese EV automakers are going to soak the market with their production capacity)
> They’ll nationalize and inflate away any institutional debt or wipe it out<p>This is just the reverse, actually, China isn’t afraid to go so far as to jail CEOs. There is no such thing as too big to fail in China, and all the Chinese domestic companies know it. The bailout playbook is a western thing.
China has been performing debt swaps with local governments to clean up their balance sheets [1], so used as an example. Agree with all of your comment. People make the mistake that China plays by artificial US capital market rules around profit and debt; they do not. They optimize for physical world success, not line to up.<p>[1] <i>Why China Is Hoping $1.6 Trillion Can Fix Its Hidden Debt Problem</i> - <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-16/china-economy-can-1-6-trillion-help-solve-xi-s-hidden-debt-problem" rel="nofollow">https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-04-16/china-eco...</a> | <a href="https://archive.today/HsaHV" rel="nofollow">https://archive.today/HsaHV</a> - April 16th, 2025
A car transport holds thousands of ships. Therefore requiring temporary storage for thousands of cars is normal.<p>Even if you count the massive "hidden debt", BYD's debt load is still a small fraction of the big car makers, many of whom hold over $200 billion in debt.
A friend of mine works in the chemical industry in Europe. One reason European producers are currently facing challenges is that Chinese producers are dumping chemicals into the global market at heavy discounts.<p>The underlying cause of this is that the Chinese housing market, which previously absorbed almost all chemicals, has effectively stalled (Evergrande, et al.).<p>I wonder whether we're observing a similar effect in the automobile industry as well.
Yes, but causality is backwards: the Chinese housing market stalled because China took the debt punch-bowl away from housing and gave it to the industrial sector.<p>It's also worth mentioning that loan subsidies play a bigger role in Chinese capital markets: Chinese industry is largely capitalized with state debt rather than private debt/equity or public markets. Zooming out, as a response to Trump's 1st term tariffs China went on a big autarky push by redirecting its citizens' and companies' deposits into a loan bazooka for the industrial sector. We are now seeing the fruits of that. The big questions have to do with (true) profitability and (true) balance sheets: can the new industries service their debts well enough for the government to hold face?
It seems that BYD are storing cars improperly but there’s nothing in the first link about financial engineering.
<a href="https://archive.today/pFuU6" rel="nofollow">https://archive.today/pFuU6</a>
Compare at the same scale:<p>Vantor Legion-2 image of the BYD plant in Zhengzhou as captured on 18 January 2025: <a href="https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#mapCenter=113.9361%2C34.3946%2C16" rel="nofollow">https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#mapCenter=113.9361%2...</a><p>Vantor WorldView-3 image of the Tesla plant in Austin as captured on 31 January 2024: <a href="https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#mapCenter=-97.6189%2C30.2212%2C16" rel="nofollow">https://livingatlas.arcgis.com/wayback/#mapCenter=-97.6189%2...</a>
I’ve been hearing about the rise of the Chinese car industry for 20 years, judging by the number of BYDs I’m now seeing it has finally happened.
They also migrated 100s of millions of mopeds to electric bikes and shipped new ebikes over the last 10 years. That enormous scale no doubt fed directly to battery technology and assembly techniques that help with cars. Many Chinese don't own cars. (That's changing fast).
Xiaomi is another maker. I saw a good review on Xiaomi SU7 - <a href="https://youtu.be/Mb6H7trzMfI" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/Mb6H7trzMfI</a> by Marques Brownlee
China is the largest car market in the world. Almost twice as large as the United States.
I see electric/hybrid BYD cars more and more every day. Meanwhile, US/EU automakers are still struggling to offer anything barely competitive.
I know that "laziness" is kind of a generic/useless criticism to throw at a company or sector, but there really is that vibe for EVs in the West.
[dead]
EU car makers need to confirm to insane EU laws regarding every little thing.
<i>Every</i> car maker selling cars in the EU needs to comply with EU laws.<p>That's why Europe is mercifully free of Cybertrucks: they can't legally operate on roads within the EU, because they don't meet the safety requirements (one of your "little things").
Don't Chinese makers need to conform to the same EU laws when selling cars in the EU? That's how it works in the US.
BYD selling to Europe would also need to conform to these
[dead]
For anyone who has tried cars from both automakers, how does BYD compare to Tesla on similar trim vehicles?
If you had to pay US/EU prices for a Tesla vs BYD you'd go with BYD no question. But the majority of Teslas are made in China and when put a Chinese made Tesla alongside a Chinese made BYD it's a coin flip.<p>So as an Australian I'd roughly rate them the same with BYD high end matching Tesla's high end and BYD having a low end that Tesla doesn't compete with (the Atto which is ~USD $15000 for a small electric hatchback has no Tesla equivalent).
BYD Sealion 7 is better than a 2025 Model Y Standard and worse than a Model Y Premium in terms of ride quality/suspension and driving dynamics.<p>The interior is more taste dependent, but the Model Y Standard is clearly a low budget version (with fabric seats) that's below the BYD. The Model Y Premium interior and seats felt higher quality to me, but it has a more minimalist design while the BYD has a more traditional setup with a screen behind the wheel.<p>The Tesla screen/app seem more responsive and premium. Also above for example VW where things are often sluggish and don't feel as well designed from a UX perspective.
It's like the 1970s all over again with how the US Big 3 makers are facing an existential threat held at bay only by protectionism. They're going to have to learn to compete yet again.
Did they ever learn to compete then? The only thing that protected them then was that Japan was a US “ally” and could be “persuaded” to go along with protectionism. China has no such need.<p>I would argue that the 70s were a trial run for whats happening today but instead of becoming more competitive the automakers focused on lobbying for Government help; a playbook that won’t help them today.<p>And even more stupidly, traditional American carmarkers are discontinuing EV models and shutting down factories JUST when they finally had an edge over their japanese competitors.
Outside the purely electric vehicles (where I believe Tesla competes very well, where is BYD at with FSD?), is there a Chinese equivalent to:<p>- The upcoming EREV (mostly electric extended range hybrid) F-150 truck? This is expected to have ~700 mile range, and of course no charging hassles. It’s main advantage over the now defunct Lightning will be towing range.<p>- The Chevy Corvette Stingray? Say what you want, but the high end ICE sports cars have an appeal of their own…<p>I believe the USA still has an edge in some areas of the market.
We are seeing the culmination of the 50+ China industrialization project at the samme time as the West's 50+ year financialization and deindustrialization project, all to concentrate even more wealth in the hands of the 0.01%.<p>China is really the only country capable and willing to build infrastructure. The ban on selling lithography AND chips to China is massively backfiring. The chip ban in particular has created a captive market for Chinese chips. In 1945, American exceptionalists believed the USSR would take 20+ yars to copy the atomic bomb, if they could do it at all. It took 4 years. China will do the same thing with EUV in the coming years.<p>Tesla is a trillion dollar company that was created entirely by government subsidies that only continues to exist because of the tariffs and import bans on BYD in the US and much of Europe.<p>Additionally, Tesla is completely dependent on Chinese rare earth exports for its products.<p>As an example of how China uses state power, a famine in the 20th century caused China to decide that food security was a national security interest. The availability of cheap, quality food is viewed as essential and the state intervenes to ensure that continues. Likewise for housing.<p>Western companies seem increasingly focused on the top 10% because the bottom 90% have nothing left to eextract.
I've never seen a comment simultaneously be so right on some things and so wrong on others.<p>> The ban on selling lithography AND chips to China is massively backfiring<p>Agreed. We will be screwed once China surpasses us in chip fabs, and they will. The idea that we can get a "durable advantage" by reaching AGI a few years before China is ridiculous. Using that to justify bans that only slow them down a few years at the cost of creating a chip fab juggernaut later is folly.<p>> Tesla is a trillion dollar company that was created entirely by government subsidies that only continues to exist because of the tariffs<p>Tesla is not supported by subsidies significantly more than any other car company and less than many including BYD obviously. They also compete directly with BYD without tariff protection worldwide <i>and in China</i> and do well. They are worth a trillion dollars because of the potential of their self-driving software which is far ahead of any other car company's including those in China.<p>> Tesla is completely dependent on Chinese rare earth exports for its products.<p>Tesla has rare earth free alternatives. There is no urgent need for them right now but they can switch if necessary.
I think EU/NA residents are a little naive on how much Chinese cars are dominating the market. Chinese cars don't sell just in China. They utterly dominate globally outside of EU/NA where they face extreme tariffs. To the point where certain cars that you'd say were American (eg. Tesla) actually make most of their cars in China.<p>Right now around the world in non EU/NA countries Tesla's a bit on the nose. All Tesla's in Australia are Chinese made regardless but it's then a choice of Chinese made Tesla vs Chinese made BYD and the BYDs are by all reports excellent cars.<p>PS to Canadians: You could be paying ~50% less for the same car, even same model to same model by allowing Chinese made cars in and it'd help you screw over a country that threatened you.
Your entire comment reads a bit like an ad for Chinese cars, conveniently omitting the damage these automakers are doing to the global car industry by dumping cheap supply wherever they can to secure market share, all enabled by <i>heavy</i> state subsidies. [0]<p>> PS to Canadians: You could be paying ~50% less for the same car, even same model to same model by allowing Chinese made cars in and it'd help you screw over a country that threatened you.<p>Because given the chance, China 100% would <i>never</i> do the same (or worse).<p>[0] <a href="https://www.csis.org/blogs/trustee-china-hand/chinese-ev-dilemma-subsidized-yet-striking" rel="nofollow">https://www.csis.org/blogs/trustee-china-hand/chinese-ev-dil...</a>
> dumping cheap supply wherever they can to secure market share, all enabled by heavy state subsidies<p>Assuming for a moment this is more true for China than for other countries. Why would the average Canadian prefer to pay more for their next car versus having a similar car subsidized by the Chinese taxpayer? Most Canadians do not work in the auto industry. Further, the protectionism practiced in the EU/US/Canada is not likely to be successful long-term, meaning those auto industries are doomed.<p>Best path forward is to let in competition, make the domestics stronger, and let consumers get cheaper cars in the meanwhile. Provide some additional temporary support if necessary. (This is more or less how the US absorbed Japanese and then Korean cars.)
I feel like closing off access is a bad long term strategy. Instead of being forced to compete and match or outmatch competition Canadian manufacturing can get complacent and lean on restrictions. But the whole thing feels like a ticking bomb.
it's not like cars are necessities like food. and i doubt these companies are unprofitable - the chinese govt has no incentive to provide the world with free cars.
Lets assume all this is true, why should i be concerned about it?<p>If the Chinese tax payer is going to help me buy a new car then thanks, my own government isn't going to do that.
The Chinese tax payer isn't voluntarily helping you though, it's China's forced resource extraction from its own citizens (wage and QoL suppression), to maintain a stranglehold on global manufacturing. Everybody (except your specific car purchase) would be better off if they used these resources domestically. Do you think they'll ever want payback? if not from you, then from the next generations.
Because over time when your own industries suffer and then become jobless, your country is less secure and wealthy.
I'm not really seeing the issue with this. Capitalists will tell you this is a good thing because consumers will benefit, or is that only capitalism if it benefits the American elites?<p>Why should I care that the CEO of Ford is struggling when he pays his workers so terrible? If they want another government bail it, we should just nationalize the industry and implement workplace democracy for the staff so they can be accountable to the workers + people in some fashion.<p>But yeah, it's sad seeing the demise of US liberalism but what do you expect when the last 50 years was naked imperialism for corporations while denying any social responsibility for the country?
Are the big capitalist car companies scared of some strong competition? Maybe they should innovate instead of lobby against international competition
> PS to Canadians: You could be paying ~50% less for the same car, even same model to same model by allowing Chinese made cars in and it'd help you screw over a country that threatened you.<p>The sheer irony of an Australian saying this! I mean you’re in danger, dude!<p><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/24/world/china-live-fire-drills-rattle-nz-aus-intl-hnk" rel="nofollow">https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/24/world/china-live-fire-drills-...</a><p>The naivety of the comments here is just astonishing.
> They utterly dominate globally outside of EU/NA where they face extreme tariffs.<p>Even inside of EU, seemingly BYD have reasonable prices, especially compared to their EU competitors. I'm an current Audi owner in Spain, who is currently very close of getting a BYD DM-i Touring, and compared to what I would get from Audi for the same price, BYD still offers a lot more in everything except "nice steering feeling", at least from what I've gathered from my test drives.
That's because the car lobby only cared about electric vehicle tariffs, the petrol cars from China are tax free<p>(There's also anti-dumping tariffs on electric bikes from China, I wonder if it's the same lobby...)
As a long term BMW driver instead of Audi I have the same. I'm swapping one of my two BMWs for a Model Y Premium. Also tried the BYD 7 but the Model Y felt nicer to drive and with more space.<p>The BMW iX1 is disappointing in range, interior luxury and power. It's below an older 6 series (that I'm switching from), and much less powerful than a Model Y AWD. No idea why BMW thinks they can price it like they do. The other option was the BMW i5 Touring but it's more expensive and feels "old" already.
Selling that many cars <i>despite</i> intense competition at home and trade barriers abroad seems the more natural way to express that story.<p>They instead focused on how in evil communist China you need to continue to make better cars than rivals in order for your business to succeed and grow.<p>What a strange system they have over there. If only they were capitalist like the US and being an incumbent connected to the regime was all you needed to keep extracting money from the population despite product stagnation.
Two things can be true at once:<p>1. BYD has rapidly surpassed many western companies in terms of product quality / desirability<p>2. Chinese automotive industry is a strategic threat to Western military capabilities. If they are successful in usurping European / American auto manufacturers, it will be a death blow to an already hollowed-out industrial base that is critical to any sustained military engagement.<p>So, yes, western companies have stagnated, and yes, the West needs to keep these dinosaurs around through subsidies (which Chinese manufacturers also receieve from their regime).
Re #2 -- locking Chinese vehicles out of the market will also lead to the downfall of our industrial base over time. In general, Americans (including those who work in US manufacturing) do not understand that Chinese vehicles are very competitive. At some point, those vehicles are likely to surpass domestic capabilities (they are already there viewed through a price/performance lens).<p>All of this is down to the simple fact that essentially no American has ever driven a Chinese vehicle and does not know anybody who has. They are not even getting secondhand reports. This is worse than the '80s when the Japanese makers arrived in the sense that in the '80s everybody could see the quality of the Toyotas and assess quality/performance for themselves. It's much worse to not even know how good the competition is.<p>From a business standpoint, it's especially bad for the domestic industry because the majors actually do need to be competitive in fast-growing regions like Latin America, Asia, and Africa. It's not a viable strategy to depend on protectionism at home while ceding countries where most people live.
If the US had a competent government they would react by pulling the same playbook as China to compete. Heavily subsidize and incentivize production of EVs by new companies to replace the rotten core of existing US automakers to produce price competitive and quality competitive vehicles, then let the old guard burn down.<p>Subsidizing the rotten core of corrupt US automakers will not produce a new or functional industrial base. It will simply maintain the illusion of an industrial base until anything of importance needs done. But that’s basically the MO of any “mature” industry in the US.
we keep saying these things while industry-after-industry gets disrupted by the chinese<p>Next industry to be disrupted is housing, because seemingly the entire western world has is not even trying to provide housing (a necessity) to everyone.<p>Subsidies are dangerous in the long term
Housing in the US is labor constrained. When I talk to GCs, subs, etc., they'll say that materials a bit more expensive, and labor is a bit more expensive; but what the <i>complain</i> about — and this can be for hours, if I get one going — is the complete lack of labor in <i>all</i> trades. This isn't a new problem; the "old hands" (GCs in the 60s and 70s) noted the labor drop out even 30+ years ago. The only saving grace we had was a strong trade force incoming population (immigrants); but, we've cut that off.<p>It wouldn't surprise me if our industry is also labor constrained? I know my brother had a machine shop to make aftermarket titanium parts for (motor)bikes, some cars, etc. He had a policy of nonstop looking for new machinists, even if he was fully staffed, because a machinist could just <i>wander off</i> at any time. With only 4 employees, he could find himself at at 25–50% loss of ship time in just a few days, at any time. It's not even like the machinists were getting more money. They'd just leave, because the new shop was 5m closer than his.<p>Fixing the labor pool issue is a decades long issue. More money in that pool won't fix things. I don't even know what's going on. Maybe I can just blame modern financialization for the issue? That seems easy, if wrong.<p>But, for sure, the complete lack of social safety net for labor can't be helping. Maybe if we guaranteed child care, 100% round-the-year safe spaces (we could use the fantastically expensive schools which are empty 75% of the time?), 3-free-meals-per-child, and free education through an associates degree? None of those are particularly expensive, even at the national scale.
So the free hand of the market isn’t quite as free after all<p>If the 20th century was a repudiation of soviet communism vs capitalism, the 21st century seems to put capitalism on the backfoot