2 comments

  • oulipo239 days ago
    Interesting, how does it differ from DBOS?
    • tuananh39 days ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;obeli.sk&#x2F;blog&#x2F;comparing-dbos-part-1&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;obeli.sk&#x2F;blog&#x2F;comparing-dbos-part-1&#x2F;</a>
    • Onavo39 days ago
      It&#x27;s under AGPL, you can&#x27;t reasonably use it for anything except non-profit work.
      • websiteapi39 days ago
        [flagged]
        • ofrzeta39 days ago
          So what does it mean? &quot;You can make money off it even through hosting but if you modify the source doing this you need to publish your changes&quot;? I think that&#x27;s about it, right?
          • Onavo38 days ago
            Not just that, you are thinking of something like the BSL. The AGPL is an EULA where if your whole app that&#x27;s unrelated to the hosted software (e.g. your WordPress site is using Obelisk) it would have to be open source too.
            • DiabloD338 days ago
              Also incorrect.<p>You are not a lawyer, nor are you quoting any reasonable legal opinion written by one.
  • kreyenborgi39 days ago
    Apparently no relation to the functional reactive web framework <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;obsidiansystems&#x2F;obelisk" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;obsidiansystems&#x2F;obelisk</a>
    • evilduck39 days ago
      A dead project that was never popular to begin with gets to claim the word in perpetuity?