Why do LLMs insist on putting "executive summaries" everywhere? Better yet, why do people not even bother to edit it out? No one would write that in a blog post about docker images.
GIL images are a complete non-starter. Anything older than 3.14 also is a non-starter. The article fails to do the one important thing which is to name a good nonGIL 3.14 image. If I can't get this, I might as well use a different language with real threading.
AMD or Intel, no ARM/aarch64? Not interested in those sweet Graviton 5s?<p><a href="https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/04/amazon_graviton_5/" rel="nofollow">https://www.theregister.com/2025/12/04/amazon_graviton_5/</a>
With the advent of LLM coding tools, I wonder how much efficiency would be gained generating the code in a language that compiles and is natively multithreaded.
Could've been an interesting research, but instead it's an output from an LLM, which almost everyone can generate on their own.<p>Other articles by this author (during 2025) seems to be only about AI, AI, and a bit more AI.