The FreeBSD Foundation's Laptop Support and Usability Project

(github.com)

119 points by mikece7 hours ago

5 comments

dzogchen7 hours ago
So, is there a laptop that has good support for FreeBSD support out of the box?My requirements are: suspend/resume, being able to drive a 5K monitor over USB-C, wifi.I found <a href="https://wiki.freebsd.org/Laptops" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.freebsd.org/Laptops</a> but I don't know how up-to-date it is.
- nrp5 hours ago
 We’ve been working with Ed and team at FreeBSD on this, and have a document showing what works currently on Framework Laptops: <a href="https://github.com/FrameworkComputer/freebsd-on-framework" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/FrameworkComputer/freebsd-on-framework</a>
 - Lammy5 hours ago
 Small correction: the AX211 card in the Framework 12 is able to connect to networks, not just scan. What you're missing is that a bunch of the Wi-Fi firmware blobs were removed from the base system between FreeBSD 14.2 and 14.3, and since 14.3 came out in June 2025 I assume that's what was tested. An upgrade from 14.2 to 14.3 would also have kept working, just not a fresh install of 14.3 or 15.0.A user needs some other working network connection first. I used my Android phone's USB tethering — all that takes is a quick `dhclient ue0`. Then one can run `fwget` to get the firmware that will make the Wi-Fi work fully: <a href="https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?fwget%288%29" rel="nofollow">https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?fwget%288%29</a>Source: very happy Framework 12 owner (currently dual-booting Windows 11 Enterprise and FreeBSD 15.0 + Wayland + KDE) :)
 - jm45 hours ago
 This is great. I've been checking on it periodically. I'm using the Framework 13 Ryzen AI 300 and the Framework Desktop so not quite there yet. Interested in taking FreeBSD for a spin when the support is there.
- zeech6 hours ago
 I can't speak to it driving a monitor over USB-C as I don't use one, but I'm currently running 15.0-RELEASE on a refurbished Dell Latitude 7280 that has worked flawlessly out of the box so far.Somebody else did a nice writeup [0] on their experience with FBSD on the same laptop.[0] <a href="https://adventurist.me/posts/00352" rel="nofollow">https://adventurist.me/posts/00352</a>
walterbell6 hours ago
FreeBSD status on Apple Silicon, <a href="https://wiki.freebsd.org/AppleSilicon" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.freebsd.org/AppleSilicon</a>
- roywashere6 hours ago
 The table lists very limited support for M1 and not even lists newer variants! I guess it was only to be expected, asahi Linux also has challenges and of course FreeBSD has less eyeballs than Linux
 - LeFantome5 hours ago
 Linux is pretty much good to go on M1 or even M2 now. No joy on anything newer than that though.
styanax6 hours ago
(random anecdote) My first and last experience with FreeBSD laptop was trying to use 3.x (!) on a Dell Inspiron 3500 (PII-350 maybe?), no sound modules were precompiled or included or whatever. Took about 3 days for `make world` to finally finish rebuilding... and then sound still not work. Red Hat 6.x "just worked" in all regards.
- yjftsjthsd-h5 hours ago
 I mean. Judging by 3.x, that was literally 25-27 years ago. Not sure what that has to do with the project that exists today?
 - 0x1ch5 hours ago
 Let me know when you can get a Dell XPS 13 (2024/25) working with FreeBSD out of the box without the need to hunt documentation down for the following.- audio - wifi - biometrics - GPU drivers that work well.
 - yjftsjthsd-h5 hours ago
 Unless you're trying to run your XPS on FreeBSD 3.x, I don't see what that has to do with either comment in this thread. Really really old OSs had problems. Current OSs also have problems, including that no OS supports all hardware, but I don't really see any connection between an anecdote about sound problems literally last century and missing drivers today.
 - 0x1ch5 hours ago
 Everything I mentioned many would consider to be essential parts of their system that should work, and would then fall under "Support and Usability" initiatives.I guess I'm pointing out that his experience 20 something years ago is still relevant today, even if there's a lower barrier to entry now.
 - jandrese5 hours ago
 Do the biometrics work on Linux? Last time I had a laptop with a fingerprint reader the whole thing was controlled by some Broadcom thing that was hostile to anything not made by Microsoft. A fingerprint reader is a highly optional feature so it's not a problem if it is not working.
 - yjftsjthsd-h5 hours ago
 Yeah, I was also thinking of pointing out that I own a Dell XPS and AFAIK its fingerprint reader has never worked on Linux and the GPU is... well, it works these days, but Nvidia still isn't exactly the nicest thing on Linux.
 0x1ch4 hours ago
 My fingerprint worked out of the box on Linux Mint, as did NVIDIA Prime with the mobile 3080. Hibernation is historically (and still is) the main issue in linux land for me. * And I believe those hibernation issues are related to corrupted graphics stacks because Nvidia, ha.
 - prmoustache3 hours ago
 OTOH I don't know of a single person using biometrics even on windows laptop. Is it a popular feature?
 rkomorn3 hours ago
 I use biometrics pretty much everywhere they're available.Currently use my laptop's fingerprint reader under Linux.
 - jimmaswell4 hours ago
 I still found it interesting and not worthy of the downvotes.
mikece7 hours ago
I'm curious why Apple doesn't support this effort: they have done a lot of the work and it won't exactly harm their market share.
- dzogchen7 hours ago
 I'm curious why you think Apple would support any effort that does not benefit their bottom line?
 - justin664 hours ago
 There's a case for it when it comes to FreeBSD specifically, since macOS uses some code from FreeBSD.
 - reactordev3 hours ago
 NeXTSTEP did but that was in the 90s. When Apple bought NeXTSTEP (and Jobs returned to the helm of Apple), they used that OS as the basis for macOS X.Due to GPL, they release the sources to the BSD code they use. Everything else is proprietary.Likewise Sony used BSD for PlayStation OS. They publish the sources to the changes to BSD they made, the rest is proprietary.
 - bitwize3 hours ago
 There's no GPL in the BSD sources used by Apple or Sony. They are free to release their operating systems as closed source; Sony does this. Apple releases Darwin sources "out of the goodness of their hearts", meaning, back in the 2000s they wanted to capture mindshare amongst the tech community for whom Linux was the strongest contender. Now that the future has refused to change, the year of the Linux desktop never materialized, and macOS has become the default developer's workstation OS, Apple has been much more sparing with Darwin source drops and may cease them altogether.
 reactordev2 hours ago
 <a href="https://www.playstation.com/en-us/oss/ps4/" rel="nofollow">https://www.playstation.com/en-us/oss/ps4/</a><a href="https://opensource.apple.com/" rel="nofollow">https://opensource.apple.com/</a>GPL where applicable. If it's MIT or just "as is" then no, they won't but they definitely publish the sources to what they are required to. Since FreeBSD is "as is" 4.4BSD licensed, they aren't required to publish the sources of Orbis.
 - stackghost3 hours ago
 There's zero business case because they want to sell you a laptop and subscription to iCloud.Improving FreeBSD will make it easier to run BSD on non-apple hardware which will eat into their bottom line.The number of people who will buy a Mac to run BSD is a rounding error, and those people won't buy iCloud subscriptions anyway.
 - justin663 hours ago
 > Improving FreeBSD will make it easier to run BSD on non-apple hardware which will eat into their bottom line.The number of people who want to run FreeBSD on their laptops probably numbers in the hundreds. Not exactly a threat to Apple's bottom line.On the other hand, some of those people are FreeBSD developers who create and maintain code that Apple would like to have the option of using. That relationship is worth something to Apple.
- wpm5 hours ago
 Users buying Macs to put BSD on them are less likely to buy things in the Mac App Store.
- jandrese5 hours ago
 Apple's attitude towards other OSes running on their hardware is less "supportive" and more "barely tolerates". Also as a general rule Apple doesn't contribute much to open source outside of some high profile projects like Swift and Webkit.
- E39M5S626 hours ago
 Apple is struggling to make MacOS functional, why would they contribute engineering time to another OS?
- OsrsNeedsf2P5 hours ago
 I still remember when MacOS being based on BSD had the community excited about the future
 - ndiddy4 hours ago
 Interesting article on the failure of Darwin as an open source project: <a href="http://www.synack.net/~bbraun/writing/osfail.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.synack.net/~bbraun/writing/osfail.html</a>
 - bluGill4 hours ago
 MacOS was never based on BSD. Apple developed the USB drivers for BSP so they could copy it into their OS, but that very different from based on BSD. (It is likely some other parts are copied as well)
 - reactordev3 hours ago
 MacOS was absolutely derived from BSD through NeXTSTEP.
 - bluGill42 minutes ago
 Large parts have been rewritten: they very different and don't show any BSD heritage.
- reactordev3 hours ago
 Apple publishes the sources to the GPL BSD code they have to but that’s where the support ends.Apple has no interest in assisting a competing operating system.
- xp845 hours ago
 I would expect if anyone even considered it, they’d immediately reject the idea, as they clearly believe that Apple retains ownership of the computers they “sell” and should control the software you could run on them.
- rjsw6 hours ago
 Apple hasn't done any work that would be useful.
 - bluGill4 hours ago
 Any is a bit too strong. Apple has does (and still does) some useful work with clang/llvm, and a few other tools that BSDs use. However this is indirect at best.
 - Lammy5 hours ago
 Weird to see this downvoted, because it's totally true. Apple imports FreeBSD's userland periodically but not its kernel/drivers, and thus has nothing to do with how well FreeBSD works on PC hardware: <a href="https://wiki.freebsd.org/Myths#FreeBSD_is_Just_macOS_Without_the_Good_Bits" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.freebsd.org/Myths#FreeBSD_is_Just_macOS_Without...</a>
reactordev3 hours ago
Yessssssss!!! I would love to help out in any way I can. I’m no good at kernels and stuff but I’m a Linux/unix man and I know graphics.I would love to see a FreeBSD Workstation edition akin to like Fedora or Ubuntu where things just work (mostly).Wayland took too long. We’re still stuck on Gtk. KDE Plasma team is making moves. I just want a nice, BSD, desktop experience without all the enshitification of copilot or Apple knowing what’s best for me.