Postfix Macros and Let Place

(nadrieril.github.io)

8 points by todsacerdoti5 days ago

3 comments

  • kazinator51 minutes ago
    &gt; let place is an idea I’ve seen floating around<p>TXR Lisp (placelet)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nongnu.org&#x2F;txr&#x2F;txr-manpage.html#S-9A89A6B8" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.nongnu.org&#x2F;txr&#x2F;txr-manpage.html#S-9A89A6B8</a><p>Emacs Lisp (gv-letplace)<p><a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gnu.org&#x2F;software&#x2F;emacs&#x2F;manual&#x2F;html_node&#x2F;elisp&#x2F;Adding-Generalized-Variables.html#index-gv_002dletplace" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.gnu.org&#x2F;software&#x2F;emacs&#x2F;manual&#x2F;html_node&#x2F;elisp&#x2F;Ad...</a>
  • mmastrac31 minutes ago
    Why new syntax? We could have:<p><pre><code> let &amp;p = &amp;x.field; </code></pre> Or<p><pre><code> let &amp;mut p = &amp;mut x.field;</code></pre>
  • rilindo1 hour ago
    This feel suspiciously like the sendmail-fiction of postfix. I don&#x27;t know if that is a good thing.<p>EDIT: Not really, but it still feels like adding unneeded