4 comments

  • Subtextofficial6 days ago
    I built a standalone, offline-first command center for Meshtastic mesh networks that runs entirely inside a single HTML file. There’s no backend, no installation, and no internet connection required. It works on laptops, tablets, phones, and some smartwatches using only native browser APIs.<p>Key Features<p>One self-contained HTML file (51KB)<p>Works fully offline (PWA)<p>Connects via Bluetooth, WiFi, or USB Serial<p>Real-time map of all mesh nodes<p>Metrics: RSSI, SNR, hop count, routing details<p>Message console + logs<p>No frameworks, no build tools, no cloud services<p>Why I built it Existing tools rely on mobile apps or desktop programs that depend on OS permissions, cloud APIs, or network access. For emergency communications, off-grid operations, research teams, and field deployments, I wanted a universal interface that would work anywhere, on any device, under any conditions.<p>Looking for feedback on:<p>Hardware compatibility (especially T-Watch S3, RAK, Heltec)<p>Browser behavior across different platforms<p>Missing features you’d like to see<p>Ideas for v2 and beyond<p>This is still early, and feedback is very welcome. Thanks for taking a look.<p>— Jordan Townsend
    • patcon22 hours ago
      Thanks! Under what conditions has this been tested so far?<p>Just feels like the right context to share before people with scarce attention (like everyone has scarce and precious attention) start investing some of it in your efforts<p>Again, I really appreciate the work and the share, just feels like it could use some clear context
    • bigiain19 hours ago
      &gt; feedback is very welcome<p>The readme is obviously AI written, and is clearly incomplete. This leaves me wondering how accurate the rest of the readme is, and how much of the code is vibe coded slop. I know some people use AI to write docs for reasonable reasons, perhaps English isn&#x27;t your primary language. But the readme smells of AI and a lack of attention to detail that feels worrying enough to me that I won&#x27;t be using this, at least unless it gains traction amongst people I know and trust.<p>Key examples:<p>&quot;[Insert your download link here]&quot;<p>&quot;License<p>Choose the license appropriate for your repository:<p>Apache 2.0<p>MIT License<p>MPL 2.0<p>Ask if you’d like these generated for you.&quot;
    • jon9544hn1 day ago
      So sick! Congrats!
  • alainx2779 hours ago
    As pointed out partially by other comments, this project does not work and is simply a one-shot skeleton made by AI. The description is a complete lie.<p>No communication or Meshtastic features are actually implemented, as no data is parsed.<p>This post should be removed.
  • xyzzy_plugh1 day ago
    Maybe I&#x27;m missing something but it&#x27;s not a self contained file if it has external imports. It appears to be using unpkg CDN for CSS and JS. There&#x27;s also multiple files, no license file, a server in python (???) and many, many indications that this is just AI slop.
    • yorwba1 day ago
      Yeah...<p><pre><code> &#x2F;&#x2F; Parse Meshtastic protobuf data here &#x2F;&#x2F; This is a simplified example - actual implementation needs protobuf parsing console.log(&#x27;Received BLE data:&#x27;, data);</code></pre>
    • Uhhrrr1 day ago
      If it works despite being a mess, I think there should be a somewhat less protective term than slop. Goulash?
      • Uhhrrr1 hour ago
        I meant to say &quot;pejorative&quot;, not &quot;protective&quot;, sorry.
      • semanticist23 hours ago
        There’s no reason to think this works fine given the readme mentions the author is waiting on their first meshtastic device to test against and the install instructions include ‘insert download link here’.<p>It’s a shame this is just slop, an approach like this could be interesting, using web APIs instead of native apps… but iOS Safari doesn’t support Web Bluetooth so it’s not going to work on iPhones at all which is a big unmentioned limitation.<p>Probably because it’s untested AI slop.
      • bdcravens22 hours ago
        I think of AI that is messy, but gets the job done more as &quot;drive-through fast food&quot;
        • bigiain19 hours ago
          Perhaps &quot;Soylent Green&quot;? It&#x27;s made of people (&#x27;s stolen creative work).
  • exabrial1 day ago
    Tangential: Is there a commercial hand-held waterproof (ip67) enclosure for the RAK4631? Tons of 3d prints, only a handful of submergible designs, and while I&#x27;m thankful for those authors, there really isn&#x27;t anything that could take a serious dunk that I&#x27;ve found.
    • bigiain19 hours ago
      Do you actually need a waterproof case? Lots of drone and rc people are just spraying boards with conformal coatings, and the seem to do fine with occasional dunkings even when powered up in salt water. I&#x27;ve seen quadcopters still &quot;working&quot; under water. I&#x27;ve seen people making submersibles that use known non-waterproof 3d printed boxes, then pumping them full of marine grade grease to eliminate any air voids that would allow water ingress.
    • lakid23 hours ago
      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;store.rakwireless.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;wismesh-pocket" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;store.rakwireless.com&#x2F;products&#x2F;wismesh-pocket</a> Gah not IP67