5 comments

  • indigovole1 day ago
    Any way to turn off the special effects?
    • r00m1011 day ago
      I just added a switch button turn them off :)
      • ahofmann1 day ago
        Oh my, thank you! I wouldn't last for more than 5 seconds on the page with that background noise animation.
        • r00m1011 day ago
          Totally fair, I’ll make the toggle more visible or default it off on first visit. Appreciate the feedback, and thanks for giving it a look even with the chaos!
          • Xss31 day ago
            Default off. It looks like an old myspace profile.
            • r00m1011 day ago
              I’m not even old enough to have used MySpace, so that one’s a bit lost on me. Most of the feedback on the homepage vibe has actually been positive, but I hear you
              • Xss31 day ago
                The overall vibe is good.<p>Animated backgrounds are gaudy though and most people (including me) dislike them in my experience.<p>They&#x27;re distracting, increase load time, increase resource use and screen updates, (especially important for battery powered devices like laptops and mobile), and just dont tend to serve a purpose aside from aesthetic sugar that tech savvy users (your target market) in general dont appreciate even when static and minimal.
              • aaron6951 day ago
                [dead]
      • UI_at_80x241 day ago
        And I didn&#x27;t stay on the page long enough to find it.
  • I&#x27;m curious as to what risk means in this context?<p>UX feedback: When I scroll to the bottom of the page linked in the post, and click on the API&#x2F;Pricing links in the footer, it fails to redirect me.
    • r00m1011 day ago
      Great question, the risk category is meant to reflect the potential sensitivity or legal&#x2F;ethical complexity of a tool’s use. For example, tools that scrape private data or could be easily misused might be tagged higher risk, while something like a domain WHOIS lookup would be low risk. It’s not a legal judgment, just a way to help users assess how carefully they might need to tread.<p>Also, thanks for catching that, I just fixed the footer links!
  • NicuCalcea1 day ago
    Some useful tools there, but how would you use some of these, for example the &quot;Curated collection of insightful quotes and comments from Reddit&quot;, for OSINT?<p>I use Bellingcat&#x27;s Toolkit, it&#x27;s constantly updated by people who do this for a living: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bellingcat.gitbook.io&#x2F;toolkit&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;bellingcat.gitbook.io&#x2F;toolkit&#x2F;</a>
    • r00m1011 day ago
      Appreciate that, and agreed, Bellingcat’s toolkit is excellent.<p>Totally fair question. That particular tool is more situational, it can surface quotes tied to a username, which can help spot ideological lean, professional background, or even cross-platform clues if phrasing is reused elsewhere. It’s less about hard identifiers, more about building contextual profiles when attribution is subtle.<p>That said, I’m always reviewing which tools actually add value. If something feels out of place, I’m open to removing or recategorizing it.
  • y421 day ago
    Why are there tools like &quot;Chattoday&quot; or &quot;Addmesnaps&quot; - don&#x27;t see how they support OSINT?
  • Rizu1 day ago
    This is built with Lovable.dev, it would have cost you a lot less caffeine without that
    • r00m1011 day ago
      You&#x27;re right, but for <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;r00m101.com" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;r00m101.com</a> backend I needed a lot caffeine